Prognostic value of pathological tumor regression grade in locally advanced gastric cancer: New perspectives from a single‐center experience

Background and Objective Perioperative chemotherapy (PC) with radical surgery represents the gold standard of treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). The prognostic value of pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not clearly established...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2021-03, Vol.123 (4), p.923-931
Hauptverfasser: Lombardi, Pietro Maria, Mazzola, Michele, Achilli, Pietro, Aquilano, Maria Costanza, De Martini, Paolo, Curaba, Annabella, Gualtierotti, Monica, Bertoglio, Camillo L., Magistro, Carmelo, Ferrari, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objective Perioperative chemotherapy (PC) with radical surgery represents the gold standard of treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). The prognostic value of pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not clearly established. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between TRG and survival in GC. Methods Patients affected by advanced GC undergoing PC and radical surgery were considered. TRG was assessed for each patient according to Becker's grading system. The correlation between TRG and survival was investigated. Results One‐hundred patients were selected; 25 showed a good response (GR) (TRG 1a/1b), while 75 had a poor response (PR) (TRG 2/3) to NACT. GR patients showed better disease‐free survival (DFS) (52 vs. 19 months, p 
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.26391