Cost drivers of locally advanced rectal cancer treatment—An analysis of a leading healthcare insurer

Background To evaluate the economic burden of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treatment from a society perspective through analysis of health insurance‐derived data of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) patients. Methods Retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing rectal r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2021-03, Vol.123 (4), p.1023-1029
Hauptverfasser: Grass, Fabian, Merchea, Amit, Mathis, Kellie L., Mishra, Nitin, Heien, Herbert, Sangaralingham, Lindsey R., Larson, David W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To evaluate the economic burden of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treatment from a society perspective through analysis of health insurance‐derived data of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) patients. Methods Retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing rectal resection within a multimodal (neoadjuvant chemoradiation + adjuvant chemotherapy) treatment strategy between January 1, 2010 and October 31, 2018, using the claims OptumLabs Data Warehouse database. Results In total, 1738 (935 commercial and 803 MA) patients were included. Overall treatment costs totaled $230,881,746 (on average $183 653 ± 82 384 per commercially insured and $73 681 ± 32 917 per MA patient). Cost distribution according to category (commercially insured patients) was: 29.92% related to outpatient care (follow‐up visits/diagnostics), radiotherapy: 21.83%, index resection: 20.62%, chemotherapy: 17.44%, surgical inpatient: 6.32%, medical inpatient: 3.28%, emergency room: 0.58%. Relative cost distribution of the index resection itself differed marginally between the three approaches and was 21.49% for open, 19.30% for laparoscopic, and 20.93% for robotic surgery. Relative cost distributions of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and outpatient treatments remained unchanged, independently of the surgical approach. This representation was similar in MA patients. Conclusion Index‐surgery related costs were outweighed by costs related to oncological and outpatient workup/follow‐up treatments independently of both surgical approach and insurance type.
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.26390