Complications following titanium cranioplasty compared with nontitanium implants cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•We compared complications rate between titanium cranioplasty with nontitanium materials cranioplasty.•Our results confirmed the advantages of titanium cranioplasty in reducing complications including hematoma, impreics fitting.•Our results suggested that clinicians should pay more attention to postoperative implant exposure.•With the inclusion of 15 studies, Our meta-analysis included the largest number of studies and can be guidance for the clinical application of cranioplasty. Decompressive craniectomy is widely used to treat medically refractory intracranial hypertension. There were still few studies focusing on the complications between titanium cranioplasty with non-titanium materials cranioplasty. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the complications following titanium cranioplasty and to make a comparison with nontitanium materials. A systematic review was used to review titanium cranioplasty characters in recent articles. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed by using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane databases and Embase for studies reporting on cranioplasty procedures that compared complication outcomes between titanium with non-titanium materials. The final 15 studies met inclusion criteria and represented 2258 cranioplasty procedures (896 titanium, 1362 nontitanium materials). Overall complications included surgical site infection, hematoma, implant exposure, seizure, cerebrospinal fluid leak, imprecise fitting. Titanium cranioplasty was associated with a significant decrease in overall complications rate (OR, 0.72; P = 0.007), hematoma rate (OR, 0.31; P = 0.0003) and imprecise fitting rate (OR, 0.35; P = 0.04). However, it also suggested that titanium cranioplasty can be greatly increased implant exposure rate (OR, 4.11; P