PSMA PET/CT vs. CT alone in newly diagnosed biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: Comparison of detection rates and therapeutic implications

•PSMA PET/CT is superior to CT on a per-patient and per-lesion basis in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients.•PSMA PET/CT enables the detection of significantly more metastases than CT alone.•Higher detection rate with PET/CT translates into therapy-change in many patients.•CT alone seem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2021-03, Vol.136, p.109556-109556, Article 109556
Hauptverfasser: Morawitz, J., Kirchner, J., Lakes, J., Bruckmann, N.M., Mamlins, E., Hiester, A., Aissa, J., Loberg, C., Schimmöller, L., Arsov, C., Antke, C., Albers, P., Antoch, G., Sawicki, L.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•PSMA PET/CT is superior to CT on a per-patient and per-lesion basis in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients.•PSMA PET/CT enables the detection of significantly more metastases than CT alone.•Higher detection rate with PET/CT translates into therapy-change in many patients.•CT alone seems insufficient for re-staging of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. To compare prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and computed tomography (CT) alone for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) and effect on treatment. This retrospective study included 59 patients with recently recorded biochemical recurrence of PCa (mean PSA 1.96 ± 1.64 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy. Patients received PET/CT with either 68Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 36) or 18F-PSMA-1007 (n = 23). PET/CT and CT images were evaluated separately in regard to PCa lesion count, type, and localisation by two physicians. Histopathology, follow-up imaging and PSA levels after salvage irradiation served as reference standard. A McNemar test was used to compare detection rates. Changes in therapeutic approaches based on staging differences between CT alone and PET/CT were assessed in a virtual multidisciplinary tumour board. There were 142 lesions in 50 of 59 patients. PSMA PET/CT detected 141 lesions (99.3 %) in 50 patients (84.7 %), while CT detected 72 lesions (50.7 %) in 29 patients (49.2 %). A significantly higher detection rate of PSMA PET/CT was observed on a lesion-based analysis (p < 0.0001) and on a patient based analysis (p < 0.0001). Herein, both 68Ga- and 18F-PSMA PET/CT performed significantly better than CT alone (p < 0.0001, respectively). In 9 patients (15.3 %) no relapse was detectable by either modality. All lesions detected by CT were also detected by PSMA PET/CT. In 38 patients PSMA PET/CT detected more lesions than CT alone, altering the treatment approach in 22 of these patients. PSMA PET/CT is superior to CT alone in detecting biochemical recurrence in PCa patients after radical prostatectomy and offered additional therapeutic options in a substantial number of patients.
ISSN:0720-048X
1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109556