Is RBBB the new LBBB? Are we going to repeat the same mistakes?

Is RBBB the new LBBB? Are we going to repeat the same mistakes?

Information on a study by Farinha et al which describes 481 patients with acute myocardial infarction, including 32 patients (6.7%) with right bundle branch block (RBBB) is presented. They excluded patients with left bundle branch block, nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay or electronic ve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electrocardiology 2021-03, Vol.65, p.34-36
Hauptverfasser: Birnbaum, Yochai, Nikus, Kjell, Atar, Dan, Jneid, Hani
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Heart attacks
Patients
Studies
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Information on a study by Farinha et al which describes 481 patients with acute myocardial infarction, including 32 patients (6.7%) with right bundle branch block (RBBB) is presented. They excluded patients with left bundle branch block, nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay or electronic ventricular pacing. Half of the patients had ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
ISSN:0022-0736
1532-8430
DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.12.010