Optimal Stent Design for High Bleeding Risk Patients: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis

To determine the best stent design for high bleeding risk (HBR) patients. Polymer-free (PF) drug eluting stent (DES) devices have a proven benefit over bare-metal stent (BMS) devices in previous trials. It is unknown, however, whether polymer-based (PB)-DES devices are as safe as PF-DES devices. A n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of invasive cardiology 2021-03, Vol.33 (3), p.E182
Hauptverfasser: Chiabrando, Juan G, Vescovo, Giovanni M, Del Buono, Marco Giuseppe, Lombardi, Marco, Camilli, Massimiliano, Ravindra, Krishna, Montone, Rocco Antonio, Niccoli, Giampaolo, Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the best stent design for high bleeding risk (HBR) patients. Polymer-free (PF) drug eluting stent (DES) devices have a proven benefit over bare-metal stent (BMS) devices in previous trials. It is unknown, however, whether polymer-based (PB)-DES devices are as safe as PF-DES devices. A network meta-analysis including all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different stent technology in HBR patients with a 1-month course of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was performed. The main efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary efficacy events included all-cause and cardiac mortality, MI, stroke, TLR, and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Safety outcomes included all bleeding, major bleeding, and stent thrombosis (ST). A total of 4 RCTs with 6456 patients were included. PF-DES and PB-DES yielded a reduced rate of MACE, MI, TLR, and TVR events compared with BMS (all P
ISSN:1557-2501
1557-2501
DOI:10.25270/jic/20.00373