Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses

Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear cardiology 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.1293-1303
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Hongyan, Mao, Wujian, Tan, Hui, Zhu, Na, Wan, Quan, Shi, Jing, Qiu, Lin, Xiu, Yan, Luo, Rongkui, Yu, Haojun, Shi, Hongcheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. 18F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). 18F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients. PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.
ISSN:1071-3581
1532-6551
DOI:10.1007/s12350-020-02510-9