Efficacy of perampanel in epilepsy patients with autism spectrum disorder
•We investigated the efficacy of PER in epilepsy patients with ASD.•Five of 17 patients were considered responders for seizure/EEG/behavioral problems.•Frontal IED correlates with seizures/EEG and behavioral improvements (p = 0.023).•Two of 6 patients without seizure/EEG improvement showed behaviora...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Epilepsy research 2021-02, Vol.170, p.106550-106550, Article 106550 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We investigated the efficacy of PER in epilepsy patients with ASD.•Five of 17 patients were considered responders for seizure/EEG/behavioral problems.•Frontal IED correlates with seizures/EEG and behavioral improvements (p = 0.023).•Two of 6 patients without seizure/EEG improvement showed behavioral improvements.•PER may be useful for seizures/frontal spikes/behavioral problems in ASD.
The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of perampanel (PER), and to identify the relationship between behavioral impairments and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in epilepsy patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Participants were ASD patients with epilepsy recruited between June 1, 2016 and June 30, 2018. Inclusion criteria were: seizures refractory to two appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs); presence of neuropsychological impairments; and ≥12 months of monitoring. PER was administered once daily, starting at a dose of 2 mg/day, increased to 12 mg/day. Seizure/EEG responders were identified as participants showing a >50 % reduction in seizure/interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) frequency (indicated as complete disappearance and response). Behavioral responders were identified as participants with a ≥50 % reduction in scores of the Japanese manuals for the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-J).
Eleven (64.7 %) of 17 patients were considered to be both seizure and EEG responders. Five (45.5 %) of these 11 patients with seizure/EEG response were considered as behavioral responders. Mean ABC-J scores were significantly decreased at 12 months after PER administration (p = 0.0002). A correlation between decreased IED frequency and ABC-J score was evident in frontal IEDs, but not in non-frontal IEDs. Participants presenting with frontal IEDs showed a significantly higher correlation between seizures/EEG and behavioral improvements (p = 0.023). Moreover, 2 of 6 patients without seizure/EEG improvement were considered as behavioral responders. No patients discontinued PER.
The results from this study suggest the utility of PER treatment in reducing clinical seizures and IEDs for ASD patients with intractable epilepsy, at least in some patients. Moreover, the present results also indicate the usefulness of PER in improving neuropsychiatric impairments, including behavioral disturbances in ASD related to improvement of clinical seizures/frontal IEDs, but also unrelated to seizure/EEG improvement in at least some ASD patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0920-1211 1872-6844 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106550 |