Health literacy and PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 completion in urogynecology patients
Introduction and hypothesis Our objectives were to describe the health literacy (HL) of urogynecology patients, characterize women with and without adequate HL, and compare errors made on the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7. Methods English-speaking women presenting to an academic urogynecology clinic in June–Ju...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2021-12, Vol.32 (12), p.3209-3215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction and hypothesis
Our objectives were to describe the health literacy (HL) of urogynecology patients, characterize women with and without adequate HL, and compare errors made on the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7.
Methods
English-speaking women presenting to an academic urogynecology clinic in June–July 2018 were invited to complete questionnaires including the Newest Vital Sign™ (NVS), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory—Short Form 20 (PFDI-20), and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7). An NVS score
>
4 indicated adequate HL. Descriptive analyses compared women with and without adequate HL and the rates and types of errors made on the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7.
Results
The mean age of participants (
N
= 115) was 65
+
15 years; 87% were white/Caucasian; 62% were college-educated. NVS scores indicated likely adequate HL in 61%. Participants at risk for limited HL (39%) were older, less educated, more likely to live alone, and more likely to require assistance to manage their healthcare (all
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-020-04643-4 |