Impact of past surgical history on perioperative outcomes in gynecologic surgery

We sought to determine if past surgical history is associated with perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single, tertiary, academic health system of women who underwent hysterectomy from May 2016 – May 2017. Past surgical history...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2021-04, Vol.161 (1), p.20-24
Hauptverfasser: Ko, Emily M., Aviles, Diego, Koelper, Nathanael C., Morgan, Mark A., Cory, Lori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We sought to determine if past surgical history is associated with perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single, tertiary, academic health system of women who underwent hysterectomy from May 2016 – May 2017. Past surgical history (PSH) involving any abdominal or pelvic surgery, baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected. For purposes of analyses, PSH was defined using three algorithms: 1) any prior abdominopelvic surgery, 2) having had abdominopelvic surgeries likely to cause adhesive disease, 3) anatomic location of prior PSH (none; pelvic; abdominal; or abdominal+pelvic). Descriptive, bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed. 1256 patients underwent hysterectomy. In adjusted analyses, PSH defined by any prior abdominopelvic surgery was associated with length of stay (LOS) (2.1 days (95%CI 1.9, 2.2) vs. 1.8 (95%CI 1.6, 2.0), (p=0.02)). PSH of procedures likely to cause adhesive disease was associated with greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (243.2 mL (95%CI 208.1, 278.3) vs. 189.0 (95%CI 1734, 204.7), (p=0.01)), longer LOS (2.5 days (95%CI 2.2, 2.8) vs. 1.9 (95%CI 1.7, 2.0), (p
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.027