Use of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for reconstruction after sarcoma resection

Background Postoperative complications after flap‐coverage in sarcoma treatment can postpone postoperative adjunct treatments. Here, we present our experience with the use of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap after sarcoma resection. Patients and Methods Patients undergo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2021-03, Vol.123 (4), p.1067-1080
Hauptverfasser: Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko, Karakawa, Ryo, Fuse, Yuma, Tanakura, Kenta, Yamamoto, Takumi, Okada, Akira, Daniel, Bassem W., Yano, Tomoyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Postoperative complications after flap‐coverage in sarcoma treatment can postpone postoperative adjunct treatments. Here, we present our experience with the use of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap after sarcoma resection. Patients and Methods Patients undergoing immediate reconstruction surgery with a flap after sarcoma resection at a single institution from February 2017 to April 2020 were identified. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical characteristics, and complications were examined. Results Thirty‐five consecutive patients underwent reconstructions using a SCIP flap (34 free and one pedicled SCIP flaps). We also identified 47 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction with other pedicled or free flaps over the same time period. No significant differences were found in patient age, gender, defect size, or operative time between these two groups. The incidences of overall complications (20/47 [42.6%] vs. 3/35 [8.5%], p 
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.26364