Induction of labor in breech presentations ‐ a retrospective cohort study

Introduction There is limited evidence on the safety and outcome of induction of breech labor. In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of spontaneous and induced breech deliveries and to describe variations in induction rates. Material and methods This was a retrospective cohort study compri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2021-07, Vol.100 (7), p.1336-1344
Hauptverfasser: Welle‐Strand, Johanne Augusta Horn, Tappert, Christian, Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction There is limited evidence on the safety and outcome of induction of breech labor. In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of spontaneous and induced breech deliveries and to describe variations in induction rates. Material and methods This was a retrospective cohort study comprising 1054 singleton live fetuses in breech presentation at Trondheim University Hospital from 2012 to 2019. The main outcome was intrapartum cesarean section, and secondary outcomes were postpartum hemorrhage, anal sphincter ruptures, Apgar scores, pH in the umbilical artery, and metabolic acidosis. All data were obtained from the hospital birth journal. Results Induction of labor was performed in 127/606 (21.0%) women with planned vaginal birth. The frequency of intrapartum cesarean section was 48.0% for induced labor vs 45.7% for spontaneous labor (P = .64). We found no differences in the frequency of postpartum hemorrhage or anal sphincter ruptures between induced and spontaneous births. The median pH in the umbilical artery was significantly lower in neonates with induced labor compared with neonates with spontaneous labor (7.22 vs 7.25; P = .02). The frequency of pH
ISSN:0001-6349
1600-0412
DOI:10.1111/aogs.14083