The results of a single-center experience with HeartMate 3 in a biventricular configuration

Right ventricular (RV) failure after left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is a difficult problem. One solution is the implantation of continuous-flow VADs in a biventricular configuration. Disappointing survival and a concerning incidence of right-sided pump thrombosis have been previou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of heart and lung transplantation 2021-03, Vol.40 (3), p.193-200
Hauptverfasser: McGiffin, David, Kure, Christina, McLean, Janelle, Marasco, Silvana, Bergin, Peter, Hare, James L., Leet, Angeline, Patel, Hitesh, Zimmet, Adam, Rix, Julia, Taylor, Andrew, Kaye, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Right ventricular (RV) failure after left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is a difficult problem. One solution is the implantation of continuous-flow VADs in a biventricular configuration. Disappointing survival and a concerning incidence of right-sided pump thrombosis have been previously reported. From May 2017 to April 2020, a total of 12 patients underwent implantation of HeartMate 3 (HM3) biventricular VADs (BiVADs) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. The right-sided pump was implanted in the right atrium in all cases. Adverse events and patient outcomes were determined. Patients were male, and the mean age was 44 years. The etiology was dilated cardiomyopathy (6 patients), sarcoid heart disease (2 patients), ischemic cardiomyopathy (1 patient), anthracycline cardiomyopathy (1 patient), non-compaction cardiomyopathy (1 patient), and arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy with biventricular involvement (1 patient). There was 1 death from multisystem failure. There were 3 episodes of right VAD thrombus (thrombosis or clot ingestion); 1 managed medically, 1 recognized intraoperatively treated with clot retrieval, and 1 requiring pump exchange. There were 3 driveline infections. At 18 months after the procedure, 5 patients (41.7%) had undergone cardiac transplantation, 5 patients (41.7%) were alive and on biventricular support, 1 patient had died (8.3%), and 1 patient had VAD explantation for myocardial recovery (8.3%). Actuarial survival at 18 months was 91.7%. In this small study, HM3 BiVAD in these critically ill patients was used with low mortality. This suggests that the timely deployment of biventricular support with HM3 can be associated with favorable outcomes.
ISSN:1053-2498
1557-3117
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2020.12.006