Evaluation of a flow cytometric test for G6PD‐deficient erythrocytes

Objective Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, an X‐linked recessive disorder, is the commonest erythrocytic enzymopathy worldwide. Reliable diagnosis and severity prediction in G6PD‐deficient/heterozygous females remain challenging. A recently developed flow cytometric test for G6PD...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tropical medicine & international health 2021-04, Vol.26 (4), p.462-468
Hauptverfasser: Kapadia, Alpeshkumar Bipinbhai, Sharma, Prashant, Jain, Karuna, Sachdeva, Man Updesh Singh, Bose, Parveen Lata, Gupta, Minakshi, Khadwal, Alka Rani, Bal, Amanjit, Das, Reena, Varma, Neelam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, an X‐linked recessive disorder, is the commonest erythrocytic enzymopathy worldwide. Reliable diagnosis and severity prediction in G6PD‐deficient/heterozygous females remain challenging. A recently developed flow cytometric test for G6PD deficiency has shown promise in precisely identifying deficient females. This paper presents our experiences with this test in a subtropical setting and presents a modification in flow cytometric data acquisition strategy. Methods The methaemoglobin reduction + ferryl Hb generation‐based flow cytometric G6PD test was compared with the screening methaemoglobin reduction test (MRT) and confirmatory G6PD enzyme activity assay (EAA) in 20 G6PD‐deficient males, 22 G6PD‐heterozygous/deficient females and 20 controls. Stained cells were also assessed for bright/dim G6PD activity under a fluorescent microscope. Results Flow cytometry separated and quantified %bright cells in heterozygous/deficient females, objectively classifying them into 6 normal (>85% bright cells), 14 intermediate (10‐85%) and two G6PD‐deficient (
ISSN:1360-2276
1365-3156
DOI:10.1111/tmi.13547