Permanent His bundle pacing using a new tridimensional delivery sheath and a standard active fixation pacing lead: The telescopic technique
Introduction Permanent His bundle pacing (PHBP) preserves physiological ventricular activation but technical difficulties have limited its widespread use. We report the first experience of PHBP performed with a new specific delivery sheath (Selectra 3D, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) and an extendable‐...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2021-02, Vol.32 (2), p.449-457 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Permanent His bundle pacing (PHBP) preserves physiological ventricular activation but technical difficulties have limited its widespread use. We report the first experience of PHBP performed with a new specific delivery sheath (Selectra 3D, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) and an extendable‐retractable active screw, stylet‐driven pacing lead (Solia S 60, Biotronik).
Methods and Results
Clinical, procedural, ECG, and electrical data from consecutive patients undergoing PHBP with this system were collected at implantation, and follow‐up was performed after 1 month. Our cohort included 17 patients (71% males; mean age 76 ± 8 years) undergoing permanent pacing for sick sinus syndrome (59%) or atrioventricular block (41%). PHBP was successful in 15 (88%) procedures with mean procedure and fluoroscopy times of 63 ± 14 and 13 ± 5 min, respectively. The pacing threshold was 2.1 ± 1.1 V @1 ms and the sensed R‐wave amplitude was 5.6 ± 3.5 mV; bipolar and unipolar pacing impedances were 526 ± 115 and 369 ± 109 Ω, respectively. At discharge, neither procedure‐related complications nor lead dislodgement or pacing capture failures was reported. After 1 month, 14 (93%) patients still demonstrated His bundle stimulation and one (7%) lost His bundle capture but the lead revision was not necessary because the myocardial pacing threshold was stable. Follow‐up threshold (2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2 V@1 ms, p = .239) and sensed R‐wave amplitude (5.6 ± 3.4 vs. 6.4 ± 2.5, p = .403) was unchanged compared to the acute phase.
Conclusion
PHBP performed with a standard active fixation pacing lead and a new delivery sheath for His pacing is feasible, safe and demonstrates clinically acceptable electric performance both at implantation and after 1 month. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1045-3873 1540-8167 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jce.14869 |