Percutaneous Cryoablation versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy of Renal T1A Tumors: a Single-Center Retrospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Purpose To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients with small renal tumors (T1a stage), considering perioperative complications. Materials and Methods Retrospective study from November 2008 to April 2017 of 122 pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2021-06, Vol.44 (6), p.892-900
Hauptverfasser: Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo, Katz, Marcelo, Falsarella, Priscila Mina, Malheiros, Daniel Tavares, Fukumoto, Helena, Lemos, Gustavo Caserta, Teich, Vanessa, Salvalaggio, Paolo Rogério
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients with small renal tumors (T1a stage), considering perioperative complications. Materials and Methods Retrospective study from November 2008 to April 2017 of 122 patients with a T1a renal mass who after being analyzed by a multidisciplinary board underwent to PCA (59 patients) or RPN (63 patients). Hospital costs in US dollars, and clinical and tumor data were compared. Non-complicated intervention was considered as an effective outcome. A hypothetical model of possible complications based on Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC) was built, grouping them into mild (CDC I and II) and severe (CDC III and IV). A decision tree model was structured from complications of published data. Results Patients who underwent PCA were older (62.5 vs. 52.8 years old, p  
ISSN:0174-1551
1432-086X
DOI:10.1007/s00270-020-02732-x