A multi-institutional study assessing general surgery faculty teaching evaluations

Resident evaluation of faculty teaching is an important metric in general surgery training, however considerable variability in faculty teaching evaluation (FE) instruments exists. Twenty-two general surgery programs provided their FE and program demographics. Three clinical education experts perfor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2021-08, Vol.222 (2), p.334-340
Hauptverfasser: Shellito, Adam D., de Virgilio, Christian, Kaji, Amy H., Harrington, Darrel W., Robertson, Jamie M., Zern, Nicole K., Spain, David A., Dickinson, Karen J., Smink, Douglas S., Cho, Nancy L., Donahue, Timothy, Aarons, Cary B., Namm, Jukes P., Amersi, Farin, Tanner, Tiffany N., Frey, Edgar Shields, Jarman, Benjamin T., Smith, Brian R., Gauvin, Jeffrey M., Brasel, Karen J., Salcedo, Edgardo S., Murayama, Kenric, Poola, V. Prasad, Mpinga, Ebondo, Inaba, Kenji, Calhoun, Kristine E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Resident evaluation of faculty teaching is an important metric in general surgery training, however considerable variability in faculty teaching evaluation (FE) instruments exists. Twenty-two general surgery programs provided their FE and program demographics. Three clinical education experts performed blinded assessment of FEs, assessing adherence 2018 ACGME common program standards and if the FE was meaningful. Number of questions per FE ranged from 1 to 29. The expert assessments demonstrated that no evaluation addressed all 5 ACGME standards. There were significant differences in the FEs effectiveness of assessing the 5 ACGME standards (p 
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.030