Comment on “Photochemical Activities of N‐Nitroso Carboxamides and Sulfoximides and Their Application to DNA Cleavage”
This Correspondence reports on a structural and mechanistic misinterpretation of an observed EPR spectrum, a misleading presentation of DNA cleavage data, and the physicochemically unsupported assignment of nitric oxide as a major DNA cleaving agent in the article cited in the title. No, not NO! Bas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemistry : a European journal 2021-01, Vol.27 (4), p.1473-1475 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This Correspondence reports on a structural and mechanistic misinterpretation of an observed EPR spectrum, a misleading presentation of DNA cleavage data, and the physicochemically unsupported assignment of nitric oxide as a major DNA cleaving agent in the article cited in the title.
No, not NO! Based on the spectroscopic and mechanistic reassignment of the EPR spectrum of a nitroxide radical and a reinterpretation of DNA cleavage data presented in the title paper, it is reasoned that intercalated amidyl radicals and/or higher nitrogen oxides, but not NO radicals, were responsible for site‐selective single‐strand scission of DNA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0947-6539 1521-3765 |
DOI: | 10.1002/chem.201500428 |