Comment on “Photochemical Activities of N‐Nitroso Carboxamides and Sulfoximides and Their Application to DNA Cleavage”

This Correspondence reports on a structural and mechanistic misinterpretation of an observed EPR spectrum, a misleading presentation of DNA cleavage data, and the physicochemically unsupported assignment of nitric oxide as a major DNA cleaving agent in the article cited in the title. No, not NO! Bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemistry : a European journal 2021-01, Vol.27 (4), p.1473-1475
1. Verfasser: Korth, Hans‐Gert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This Correspondence reports on a structural and mechanistic misinterpretation of an observed EPR spectrum, a misleading presentation of DNA cleavage data, and the physicochemically unsupported assignment of nitric oxide as a major DNA cleaving agent in the article cited in the title. No, not NO! Based on the spectroscopic and mechanistic reassignment of the EPR spectrum of a nitroxide radical and a reinterpretation of DNA cleavage data presented in the title paper, it is reasoned that intercalated amidyl radicals and/or higher nitrogen oxides, but not NO radicals, were responsible for site‐selective single‐strand scission of DNA.
ISSN:0947-6539
1521-3765
DOI:10.1002/chem.201500428