Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study

This study sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of conduction system pacing by performing left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). There are limited data from single centers showing that LBBAP may circumvent the technical and electrophysiological challenges encountered with His bundle pacing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Clinical electrophysiology 2020-12, Vol.6 (14), p.1773-1782
Hauptverfasser: Padala, Santosh K, Master, Vivak M, Terricabras, Maria, Chiocchini, Andrea, Garg, Aatish, Kron, Jordana, Shepard, Richard, Kalahasty, Gautham, Azizi, Zahara, Tsang, Bernice, Khaykin, Yaariv, Pantano, Alfredo, Koneru, Jayanthi N, Ellenbogen, Kenneth A, Verma, Atul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of conduction system pacing by performing left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). There are limited data from single centers showing that LBBAP may circumvent the technical and electrophysiological challenges encountered with His bundle pacing. Patients referred for pacemaker implantation at 2 centers between February 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020, were considered for LBBAP. LBBAP was performed by implanting a lumen-less, exposed helix lead approximately 2 cm distal to the His bundle and deep into the septum using a specialized delivery sheath. Implant success rates, complications, and electrophysiological parameters were assessed. LBBAP was successful in 305 of 341 patients (89%). Mean age was 72 ± 12 years; 45% were women; and 39% had QRS duration (QRSd) >130 ms, 22% right bundle branch block, 11% left bundle branch block, and 6% intraventricular conduction defect. Pacing indications were sinus node dysfunction in 28.7%, atrioventricular block in 52.5%, cardiac resynchronization therapy in 8.8%, and refractory atrial fibrillation in 10% of patients. Procedural duration was 74.7 ± 34 min and fluoroscopic time was 10.4 ± 8.1 min. The mean baseline QRSd and paced QRSd in the overall cohort was 114 ± 29.8 ms versus 112 ± 11.7 ms (p 
ISSN:2405-5018
DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.004