Does continuous positive airways pressure treatment improve clinical depression in obstructive sleep apnea? A randomized wait‐list controlled study

Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent sleep disorder that is associated with a range of adverse daytime sequelae, including significantly higher rates of clinical depression than is seen in the general community. Improvements in depressive symptoms occur after treatment of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Depression and anxiety 2021-05, Vol.38 (5), p.498-507
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Melinda L., Tolson, Julie, Schembri, Rachel, Bartlett, Delwyn, Rayner, Genevieve, Lee, V Vien, Barnes, Maree
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent sleep disorder that is associated with a range of adverse daytime sequelae, including significantly higher rates of clinical depression than is seen in the general community. Improvements in depressive symptoms occur after treatment of the primary sleep disorder, suggesting that comorbid depression might be an intrinsic feature of OSA. However, there are limited data on whether treatment for OSA in patients diagnosed with clinical depression improves mood symptoms meaningfully enough to lead to the remission of the psychiatric diagnosis. Methods N = 121 untreated OSA patients were randomized to either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment or waitlist control, and depressive symptoms, sleepiness and clinical depression (using a structured clinical interview) were assessed at baseline and 4 months. Linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted, controlling for baseline scores, stratification factors and antidepressant use. Results Depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = −4.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −7.25, −1.13; p = .008) and sleepiness (OR = −4.71; 95% CI = −6.26, −3.17; p 
ISSN:1091-4269
1520-6394
DOI:10.1002/da.23131