Clinical feasibility of single‐shot fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery with wide inversion recovery pulse designed to reduce cerebrospinal fluid and motion artifacts for evaluation of uncooperative patients in acute stroke protocol
Fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging is a key sequence for stroke assessment. Motion artifact reduction with short acquisition time is still challenging, but necessary in the magnetic resonance (MR) stroke protocol, especially for uncooperative patients suspected of stroke. The aim of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2021-06, Vol.53 (6), p.1833-1838 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging is a key sequence for stroke assessment. Motion artifact reduction with short acquisition time is still challenging, but necessary in the magnetic resonance (MR) stroke protocol, especially for uncooperative patients suspected of stroke. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of modified single‐shot FLAIR with wide inversion recovery pulses for use in stroke patients. This is a prospective study, which included 30 patients clinically suspected of stroke who were examined by MR stroke protocol from January 2018 to September 2018. A 1.5 T, multi‐shot‐turbo spin‐echo (TSE) conventional FLAIR, and single‐shot‐TSE‐FLAIR with wide inversion recovery pulse were used. Modified single‐shot FLAIR was obtained for 30 patients with suspected stroke who moved during conventional FLAIR scan. Motion artifacts were randomly and independently scored using a 5‐grade scale by three radiologists in blinded fashion. Whether the FLAIR vessel hyperintensity sign was present was visually evaluated. Statistical tests included Wilcoxon‐signed rank test and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. The motion artifact score was significantly lower in single‐shot FLAIR than in conventional FLAIR (0.37 ± 0.56 vs. 1.83 ± 1.18; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.27483 |