The cardiovascular consequences of fatiguing expiratory muscle work in otherwise resting healthy humans

In 11 healthy adults (25 ± 4 yr; 2 female, 9 male subjects), we investigated the effect of expiratory resistive loaded breathing [65% maximal expiratory mouth pressure (MEP), 15 breaths·min , duty cycle 0.5; ERL ] on mean arterial pressure (MAP), leg vascular resistance (LVR), and leg blood flow ([F...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2021-02, Vol.130 (2), p.421-434
Hauptverfasser: Hardy, Tim A, Paula-Ribeiro, Marcelle, Silva, Bruno M, Lyall, Gemma K, Birch, Karen M, Ferguson, Carrie, Taylor, Bryan J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In 11 healthy adults (25 ± 4 yr; 2 female, 9 male subjects), we investigated the effect of expiratory resistive loaded breathing [65% maximal expiratory mouth pressure (MEP), 15 breaths·min , duty cycle 0.5; ERL ] on mean arterial pressure (MAP), leg vascular resistance (LVR), and leg blood flow ([Formula: see text]). On a separate day, a subset of five male subjects performed ERL targeting 65% of maximal expiratory gastric pressure (ERL ). ERL-induced expiratory muscle fatigue was confirmed by a 17 ± 5% reduction in MEP ( < 0.05) and a 16 ± 12% reduction in the gastric twitch pressure response to magnetic nerve stimulation ( = 0.09) from before to after ERL and ERL , respectively. From rest to task failure in ERL and ERL , MAP increased (ERL = 31 ± 10 mmHg, ERL = 18 ± 9 mmHg, both < 0.05), but group mean LVR and [Formula: see text] were unchanged (ERL : LVR = 0.78 ± 0.21 vs. 0.97 ± 0.36 mmHg·mL ·min, [Formula: see text] = 133 ± 34 vs. 152 ± 74 mL·min ; ERL : LVR = 0.70 ± 0.21 vs. 0.84 ± 0.33 mmHg·mL ·min, [Formula: see text] = 160 ± 48 vs. 179 ± 110 mL·min ) (all ≥ 0.05). Interestingly, [Formula: see text] during ERL oscillated within each breath, increasing (∼66%) and decreasing (∼50%) relative to resting values during resisted expirations and unresisted inspirations, respectively. In conclusion, fatiguing expiratory muscle work did not affect group mean LVR or [Formula: see text] in otherwise resting humans. We speculate that any sympathetically mediated peripheral vasoconstriction was counteracted by transient mechanical effects of high intra-abdominal pressures during ERL. Fatiguing expiratory muscle work in otherwise resting humans elicits an increase in sympathetic motor outflow; whether limb blood flow ([Formula: see text]) and leg vascular resistance (LVR) are affected remains unknown. We found that fatiguing expiratory resistive loaded breathing (ERL) did not affect group mean [Formula: see text] or LVR. However, within-breath oscillations in [Formula: see text] may reflect a sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction that was counteracted by transient increases in [Formula: see text] due to the mechanical effects of high intra-abdominal pressure during ERL.
ISSN:8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00116.2020