Exposure to and experience of self-harm and self-harm related content: An exploratory network analysis

•Study examined wide variety of types of exposure to self-harm and related content•First ever network analysis of diverse range of exposure mediums•In-passing and online exposure directly associated with self-harm thoughts and behaviours•Future research should investigate temporal dynamics of differ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatry research 2021-01, Vol.295, p.113572-113572, Article 113572
Hauptverfasser: Kirtley, Olivia J., Hussey, Ian, Marzano, Lisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Study examined wide variety of types of exposure to self-harm and related content•First ever network analysis of diverse range of exposure mediums•In-passing and online exposure directly associated with self-harm thoughts and behaviours•Future research should investigate temporal dynamics of different exposure mediums Exposure to the self-harm behaviour of others plays a role in individuals’ own self-harm thoughts and behaviours, but there has been little consideration of the broader range of mediums through which exposure to self-harm related content may occur. N = 477 participants completed an online study, including questions regarding lifetime history of self-harm thoughts and behaviours and the frequency with which they had been exposed to self-harm via various mediums. Gaussian Markov random field network models were estimated using graphical LASSO and extended Bayesian information criterion. Bootstrapping revealed that exposure mediums with a direct connection to self-harm thoughts and behaviours were the internet (rrp = .34, 95% CI [.26, .42]) and in-passing ‘miscellaneous’ exposure (rrp = .14, 95% CI [.00, .23]). However, stability of the network centrality was low (expected influence stability = 0.52). The node with the greatest increase in expected influence within the network was miscellaneous “in-passing” exposure. In-passing exposure is an understudied exposure medium. Our results may suggest new types of exposure mediums for future research. Data were cross-sectional, so temporal relationships between exposure and behaviour could not be determined. Low stability of the networks suggests that future similar studies would benefit from larger sample sizes.
ISSN:0165-1781
1872-7123
DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113572