A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues

•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological psychology 2021-02, Vol.159, p.108007-108007, Article 108007
Hauptverfasser: Torrents-Rodas, David, Koenig, Stephan, Uengoer, Metin, Lachnit, Harald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108007
container_issue
container_start_page 108007
container_title Biological psychology
container_volume 159
creator Torrents-Rodas, David
Koenig, Stephan
Uengoer, Metin
Lachnit, Harald
description •Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2470627542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301051120301678</els_id><sourcerecordid>2470627542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1O0jTtcUJ8SZO4wDlKE09k6pqSdJP278no2JWTI-exX_kh5I7CnAItH9bzxvk-7s2XnzNgh24FIM_IlFaS5yUrynMyBQ40B0HphFzFuAZIbyEuyYRzzigVdEoWiyy4iJnrsj6gdWZwvsswBB9SzwTUEWOmhwG735_BZy4EbHGnuyEzW4zX5GKl24g3xzojn89PH4-v-fL95e1xscxNwcSQV0VNKVpWMwFClrzWYCtroKrrpmIMqTRoZClEApBaDii1rXnVoIWVQeAzcj_u7YP_TrmD2rhosG11h34bFSsklEyKgiVUjqgJPsaAK9UHt9Fhryiogz-1Vid_6uBPjf7S5O0xZNts0J7m_oQlYDECmE7dOQwqGoedSeoCmkFZ7_4N-QFMjYTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470627542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Torrents-Rodas, David ; Koenig, Stephan ; Uengoer, Metin ; Lachnit, Harald</creator><creatorcontrib>Torrents-Rodas, David ; Koenig, Stephan ; Uengoer, Metin ; Lachnit, Harald</creatorcontrib><description>•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33321151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Association Learning ; Associative learning ; Attention ; Conditioning, Classical ; Cues ; Eye-tracking ; Fixation, Ocular ; Humans ; Irrelevant cues ; Learning ; Prediction error</subject><ispartof>Biological psychology, 2021-02, Vol.159, p.108007-108007, Article 108007</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8083-4184 ; 0000-0001-5453-2860 ; 0000-0003-0222-7770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051120301678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torrents-Rodas, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uengoer, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachnit, Harald</creatorcontrib><title>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</title><title>Biological psychology</title><addtitle>Biol Psychol</addtitle><description>•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.</description><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Associative learning</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Eye-tracking</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irrelevant cues</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Prediction error</subject><issn>0301-0511</issn><issn>1873-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1O0jTtcUJ8SZO4wDlKE09k6pqSdJP278no2JWTI-exX_kh5I7CnAItH9bzxvk-7s2XnzNgh24FIM_IlFaS5yUrynMyBQ40B0HphFzFuAZIbyEuyYRzzigVdEoWiyy4iJnrsj6gdWZwvsswBB9SzwTUEWOmhwG735_BZy4EbHGnuyEzW4zX5GKl24g3xzojn89PH4-v-fL95e1xscxNwcSQV0VNKVpWMwFClrzWYCtroKrrpmIMqTRoZClEApBaDii1rXnVoIWVQeAzcj_u7YP_TrmD2rhosG11h34bFSsklEyKgiVUjqgJPsaAK9UHt9Fhryiogz-1Vid_6uBPjf7S5O0xZNts0J7m_oQlYDECmE7dOQwqGoedSeoCmkFZ7_4N-QFMjYTw</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Torrents-Rodas, David</creator><creator>Koenig, Stephan</creator><creator>Uengoer, Metin</creator><creator>Lachnit, Harald</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-4184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-2860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-7770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</title><author>Torrents-Rodas, David ; Koenig, Stephan ; Uengoer, Metin ; Lachnit, Harald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Associative learning</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Eye-tracking</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irrelevant cues</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Prediction error</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torrents-Rodas, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uengoer, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachnit, Harald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torrents-Rodas, David</au><au>Koenig, Stephan</au><au>Uengoer, Metin</au><au>Lachnit, Harald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><spage>108007</spage><epage>108007</epage><pages>108007-108007</pages><artnum>108007</artnum><issn>0301-0511</issn><eissn>1873-6246</eissn><abstract>•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33321151</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-4184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-2860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-7770</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0511
ispartof Biological psychology, 2021-02, Vol.159, p.108007-108007, Article 108007
issn 0301-0511
1873-6246
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2470627542
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Association Learning
Associative learning
Attention
Conditioning, Classical
Cues
Eye-tracking
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Irrelevant cues
Learning
Prediction error
title A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20rise%20in%20prediction%20error%20increases%20attention%20to%20irrelevant%20cues&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychology&rft.au=Torrents-Rodas,%20David&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=159&rft.spage=108007&rft.epage=108007&rft.pages=108007-108007&rft.artnum=108007&rft.issn=0301-0511&rft.eissn=1873-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470627542%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470627542&rft_id=info:pmid/33321151&rft_els_id=S0301051120301678&rfr_iscdi=true