A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues
•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological psychology 2021-02, Vol.159, p.108007-108007, Article 108007 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108007 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108007 |
container_title | Biological psychology |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Torrents-Rodas, David Koenig, Stephan Uengoer, Metin Lachnit, Harald |
description | •Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli.
We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2470627542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301051120301678</els_id><sourcerecordid>2470627542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1O0jTtcUJ8SZO4wDlKE09k6pqSdJP278no2JWTI-exX_kh5I7CnAItH9bzxvk-7s2XnzNgh24FIM_IlFaS5yUrynMyBQ40B0HphFzFuAZIbyEuyYRzzigVdEoWiyy4iJnrsj6gdWZwvsswBB9SzwTUEWOmhwG735_BZy4EbHGnuyEzW4zX5GKl24g3xzojn89PH4-v-fL95e1xscxNwcSQV0VNKVpWMwFClrzWYCtroKrrpmIMqTRoZClEApBaDii1rXnVoIWVQeAzcj_u7YP_TrmD2rhosG11h34bFSsklEyKgiVUjqgJPsaAK9UHt9Fhryiogz-1Vid_6uBPjf7S5O0xZNts0J7m_oQlYDECmE7dOQwqGoedSeoCmkFZ7_4N-QFMjYTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470627542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Torrents-Rodas, David ; Koenig, Stephan ; Uengoer, Metin ; Lachnit, Harald</creator><creatorcontrib>Torrents-Rodas, David ; Koenig, Stephan ; Uengoer, Metin ; Lachnit, Harald</creatorcontrib><description>•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli.
We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33321151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Association Learning ; Associative learning ; Attention ; Conditioning, Classical ; Cues ; Eye-tracking ; Fixation, Ocular ; Humans ; Irrelevant cues ; Learning ; Prediction error</subject><ispartof>Biological psychology, 2021-02, Vol.159, p.108007-108007, Article 108007</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8083-4184 ; 0000-0001-5453-2860 ; 0000-0003-0222-7770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051120301678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torrents-Rodas, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uengoer, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachnit, Harald</creatorcontrib><title>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</title><title>Biological psychology</title><addtitle>Biol Psychol</addtitle><description>•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli.
We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.</description><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Associative learning</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Eye-tracking</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irrelevant cues</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Prediction error</subject><issn>0301-0511</issn><issn>1873-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1O0jTtcUJ8SZO4wDlKE09k6pqSdJP278no2JWTI-exX_kh5I7CnAItH9bzxvk-7s2XnzNgh24FIM_IlFaS5yUrynMyBQ40B0HphFzFuAZIbyEuyYRzzigVdEoWiyy4iJnrsj6gdWZwvsswBB9SzwTUEWOmhwG735_BZy4EbHGnuyEzW4zX5GKl24g3xzojn89PH4-v-fL95e1xscxNwcSQV0VNKVpWMwFClrzWYCtroKrrpmIMqTRoZClEApBaDii1rXnVoIWVQeAzcj_u7YP_TrmD2rhosG11h34bFSsklEyKgiVUjqgJPsaAK9UHt9Fhryiogz-1Vid_6uBPjf7S5O0xZNts0J7m_oQlYDECmE7dOQwqGoedSeoCmkFZ7_4N-QFMjYTw</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Torrents-Rodas, David</creator><creator>Koenig, Stephan</creator><creator>Uengoer, Metin</creator><creator>Lachnit, Harald</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-4184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-2860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-7770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</title><author>Torrents-Rodas, David ; Koenig, Stephan ; Uengoer, Metin ; Lachnit, Harald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-84911ed2925057639a0d8dc0899b822e17cec7655925e1d30e7ad938bed0fce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Associative learning</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Eye-tracking</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irrelevant cues</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Prediction error</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torrents-Rodas, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uengoer, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachnit, Harald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torrents-Rodas, David</au><au>Koenig, Stephan</au><au>Uengoer, Metin</au><au>Lachnit, Harald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><spage>108007</spage><epage>108007</epage><pages>108007-108007</pages><artnum>108007</artnum><issn>0301-0511</issn><eissn>1873-6246</eissn><abstract>•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli.
We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33321151</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-4184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-2860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-7770</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-0511 |
ispartof | Biological psychology, 2021-02, Vol.159, p.108007-108007, Article 108007 |
issn | 0301-0511 1873-6246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2470627542 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Association Learning Associative learning Attention Conditioning, Classical Cues Eye-tracking Fixation, Ocular Humans Irrelevant cues Learning Prediction error |
title | A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20rise%20in%20prediction%20error%20increases%20attention%20to%20irrelevant%20cues&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychology&rft.au=Torrents-Rodas,%20David&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=159&rft.spage=108007&rft.epage=108007&rft.pages=108007-108007&rft.artnum=108007&rft.issn=0301-0511&rft.eissn=1873-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470627542%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470627542&rft_id=info:pmid/33321151&rft_els_id=S0301051120301678&rfr_iscdi=true |