A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues

•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological psychology 2021-02, Vol.159, p.108007-108007, Article 108007
Hauptverfasser: Torrents-Rodas, David, Koenig, Stephan, Uengoer, Metin, Lachnit, Harald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Attention to objects is determined by physical properties and learning experience.•Stimuli irrelevant for predicting significant outcomes tend to be ignored.•Experiencing prediction error increases attention to irrelevant stimuli. We investigated whether a sudden rise in prediction error widens an individual’s focus of attention by increasing ocular fixations on cues that otherwise tend to be ignored. To this end, we used a discrimination learning task including cues that were either relevant or irrelevant for predicting the outcomes. Half of participants experienced contingency reversal once they had learned to predict the outcomes (reversal group, n = 30). The other half experienced the same contingencies throughout the task (control group, n = 30). As participants’ prediction accuracy increased, they showed a decrease in the number of fixations directed to the irrelevant cues. Following contingency reversal, participants in the reversal group showed a drop in accuracy, indicating a rise in prediction error, and fixated on the irrelevant cues more often than participants in the control group. We discuss the results in the context of attentional theories of associative learning.
ISSN:0301-0511
1873-6246
DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007