Bidirectional Irrigation System to Treat a Difficult Wound: A Case Series

Aims To date, there is no distinct principle determining whether to use irrigation under negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT). We developed a new economical device to manage difficult wounds, employing 1 of 2 techniques depending on the wound condition. Methods This case series study was conducted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of lower extremity wounds 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.156-162
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Li-Yung, Hou, Jin-De, Peng, Chian-Ze
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims To date, there is no distinct principle determining whether to use irrigation under negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT). We developed a new economical device to manage difficult wounds, employing 1 of 2 techniques depending on the wound condition. Methods This case series study was conducted in 12 patients with difficult wound, from 2017 to 2018. Four patients were treated with Type A bidirectional irrigation system (wound irrigation), while 8 patients were treated with Type B bidirectional irrigation system (wound irrigation combined with NPWT). Results In the Type A device group, inflammatory profiles in case I, case IV, and case VIII were not monitored due to the stability of their wound. The mean recovery period was 3.75 weeks (2-8 weeks), with decreases in 100% healing rate. In the Type B device group, we noted an average of 71% reduction in inflammatory profiles. All patients’ infections were resolved or were healing, and 7 patients recovered satisfactorily. The recovery period ranged from 4 to 17 weeks, with a median value of 7 weeks. Conclusion Bidirectional irrigation system decreases secondary infections and complications, and increases the healing rate in patients with difficult wound.
ISSN:1534-7346
1552-6941
DOI:10.1177/1534734620974551