Outcome satisfaction in long‐term survivors of oncologic limb salvage procedures

Objective We present data from our recently completed study that suggests that joint salvage is the key parameter in keeping the limb salvage ethos relevant. Methods We reviewed all patients operated on nationally over 30 years (1978 to 2008). We identified 265 survivors of which 162 were available...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer care 2021-03, Vol.30 (2), p.e13377-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Suresh Nathan, Saminathan, Tan Lay Hua, Grace, Mei Yoke, Chan, Mann Hong, Tan, Peter Pereira, Barry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective We present data from our recently completed study that suggests that joint salvage is the key parameter in keeping the limb salvage ethos relevant. Methods We reviewed all patients operated on nationally over 30 years (1978 to 2008). We identified 265 survivors of which 162 were available for evaluation at the time of survey. Results There were 92 males and 70 females followed an average 9.1±SD3.1 years. Average age at survey was 38±SD17 years. ANOVA for mental health and TESS degree of importance for ADL identified that all categories of joint preservation were similar to an average group of people from the population. Physical health scores were significantly better amongst joint‐preserved versus joint replacement patients (p = 0.003). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between amputees with respect to physical health scores compared to arthrodesed and joint‐replaced individuals. Biological reconstructions scored significantly better than metallic segmentary reconstructions (p 
ISSN:0961-5423
1365-2354
DOI:10.1111/ecc.13377