Primary sludge fermentate as carbon source for mainstream partial denitrification–anammox (PdNA)

Primary sludge fermentate, a concentrated hydrolyzed wastewater carbon, was evaluated for use as an alternative carbon source for mainstream partial denitrification–anammox (PdNA) in a suspended growth activated sludge process in terms of partial denitrification (PdN) efficiency, PdNA nitrogen removal contributions, and final effluent quality. Fermenter operation at a 2‐day sludge retention time (SRT) resulted in the maximum achievable yield of 0.14 ± 0.05 g sCOD/g VSS without release of excessive ammonia and phosphorus to the system. Based on the results of batch experiments, fermentate addition led to PdN efficiency of 93 ± 14%, which was similar to acetate at a nitrate residual of 2–3 mg N/L. In the pilot‐scale mainstream deammonification reactor, PdN efficiency using fermentate was 49 ± 24%, which was lower than acetate (66 ± 24% during acetate period I and 70 ± 21% during acetate period II), most probably due to lower nitrate and ammonium kinetics in the PdN zone. Methanol cost‐saving potential for the application of PdNA as the main short‐cut nitrogen pathway was estimated to be 30% to 55% depending on the PdN efficiency achieved. Practitioner points Primary sludge fermentate was evaluated as an alternative carbon source for mainstream partial denitrification–anammox (PdNA). Fermenter operated at a 1 to 2 day SRT resulted in the maximum achievable yield without the release of excessive ammonia and phosphorus to the system. Although 93% partial denitrification efficiency was achieved with fermentate in batch experiments, around 49% PdN efficiency was achieved in pilot studies. Application of PdNA with fermentate can result in significant methanol cost savings. This paper showed the use of primary sludge fermentate as carbon source for partial denitrification anammox (PdNA). Pilot results showed the potential for 30‐40% methanol savings as a result of PdNA application. Based on kinetic testing under ideal conditions, increased methanol savings were estimated, thus indicating further room for optimization.