Quantifying cognition and fatigue to enhance the sensitivity of the EDSS during relapses

Background: Cognition is affected by relapses in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), yet the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) does not readily detect cognitive changes. Objective: The objective of this study is to improve the detection of cognitive decline during relapses, by incorporatin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multiple sclerosis 2021-06, Vol.27 (7), p.1077-1087
Hauptverfasser: Morrow, Sarah A, Conway, Devon, Fuchs, Tom, Wojcik, Curtis, Unverdi, Mahmut, Yasin, Faizan, Pol, Jeta, Eckert, Sveltlana, Hojnacki, David H, Dwyer, Michael, Zivadinov, Robert, Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca, Benedict, Ralph HB
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Cognition is affected by relapses in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), yet the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) does not readily detect cognitive changes. Objective: The objective of this study is to improve the detection of cognitive decline during relapses, by incorporating the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) into the cerebral Functional System Score (CFSS) of the EDSS. Methods: This prospective study recruited PwMS from three dedicated MS centers. All subjects had EDSS, SDMT, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) administered. Subjects experiencing a relapse were assigned to the relapse group (RG). Matched controls from the larger cohort were assigned to the stable group (SG). RG and SG subjects underwent the same evaluation at relapse and 3 months later. Our main outcomes were a modified CFSS (m-CFSS) and modified EDSS (m-EDSS), incorporating SDMT and FSS, accounting for cognitive performance and fatigue rating, during relapse. Results: The full cohort included 592 subjects; 80 qualified for RG and 72 were matched to the SG. The m-CFSS was significantly higher than CFSS at baseline (median = 2 vs. median = 0, p 
ISSN:1352-4585
1477-0970
DOI:10.1177/1352458520973618