Clinical Outcomes According to ECG Presentations in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the Culprit Lesion Only PCI vs Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock Trial

The impact of ECG presentations of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in cardiogenic shock is unknown. In myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, is there a difference in the outcomes and effect of revascularization strategies between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2021-04, Vol.159 (4), p.1415-1425
Hauptverfasser: Zeitouni, Michel, Akin, Ibrahim, Desch, Steffen, Barthélémy, Olivier, Brugier, Delphine, Collet, Jean-Philippe, de Waha-Thiele, Suzanne, Greenwood, John P., Guedeney, Paul, Hage, Georges, Hauguel-Moreau, Marie, Huber, Kurt, Kerneis, Mathieu, Noc, Marko, Oldroyd, Keith G., Piek, Jan J., Rouanet, Stéphanie, Savonitto, Stefano, Serpytis, Pranas, Silvain, Johanne, Stepinska, Janina, Vicaut, Eric, Vrints, Christiaan J.M., Windecker, Stephan, Zeymer, Uwe, Thiele, Holger, Montalescot, Gilles, Torremante, Patrizia, Meyer-Saraei, Roza, Tebbe, Ulrich, Wöhrle, Jochen, Pachinger, Otmar, Busch, Clemens, Pfeiffer, Nathalie, Neumer, Alexander, Schneider, Steffen, Ouarrak, Taoufik, Reimer, Thomas, Lober, Christiane, Clemmensen, Peter, Follath, Ferenc, Wegscheider, Karl, Barthélémy, O., Zeitouni, M., Overtchouk, P., Guedeney, P., Hage, G., Hauguel-Moreau
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The impact of ECG presentations of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in cardiogenic shock is unknown. In myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, is there a difference in the outcomes and effect of revascularization strategies between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and left bundle branch block myocardial infarction (LBBBMI) vs ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)? Cardiogenic shock patients from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial with NSTEMI or LBBBMI were compared with STEMI patients for 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. The interaction between ECG presentation and the effect of revascularization strategies on outcomes was evaluated. Of 665 cardiogenic shock patients analyzed, 55.9% demonstrated STEMI, 29.3% demonstrated NSTEMI, and 14.7% demonstrated LBBBMI. Patients differed in mean age (68.0 years in STEMI patients, 71.0 years in NSTEMI patients, and 73.5 years in LBBBMI patients; P = .015), cardiovascular risk factors, and angiographic severity. No difference was found in the 30-day risk of death between NSTEMI and STEMI patients (48.7% vs 43.0%; adjusted OR [aOR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.66-1.67; P = .85), nor between LBBBMI and STEMI patients (59.2% vs 43.0%; aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.73-2.34; P = .36). Although the univariate risk of death by 1 year was higher in NSTEMI and LBBBMI patients compared with STEMI patients, ECG presentation was not an independent risk factor of mortality after adjustment (NSTEMI vs STEMI: 56.4% vs 46.8%; aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.76-1.92; P = .42; LBBBMI vs STEMI: 69.4% vs 46.8%; aOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.89-2.84; P = .12). ECG presentation did not modify the effect of the revascularization strategy on 30-day and 1-year mortality (P = .91 and P = .97 for interaction). In patients with cardiogenic shock, NSTEMI and LBBBMI presentations reflect higher-risk profiles than STEMI presentations, but are not independent risk factors of mortality. ECG presentations did not modify the treatment effect, supporting culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention as the preferred strategy across the AMI spectrum.
ISSN:0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.089