Multi-center implementation of automated age-adjusted D-dimer results reduces unnecessary PE imaging
Several previous studies have investigated the clinical utility of age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE). We performed a pre/post implementation study, using data from a mid-Atlantic healthcare system comprising 6 hospitals and 400,000 ED visits to determine whether imp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of emergency medicine 2021-02, Vol.40, p.181-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Several previous studies have investigated the clinical utility of age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE).
We performed a pre/post implementation study, using data from a mid-Atlantic healthcare system comprising 6 hospitals and 400,000 ED visits to determine whether implementing age adjusted D-dimer cutoffs reduced the number of imaging tests performed.
Retrospective study of all patients who had a D-dimer performed during ED visits between September 2015 to September 2018. On March 21, 2017, the D-dimer upper limit of normal system-wide was increased for patients over 50 to: Age (years) x 0.01μg/mL. D-dimer results were displayed as normal or high based on automated age adjustment. EHR Chart review was performed 1.5 years prior to implementation of age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs, as well as 1.5 years after to evaluate mortality and test accuracy characteristics such as false negative rates. Comparisons were made using chi-square testing.
22,302 D-dimers were performed pre-implementation of which 10,837 (48.6%) were positive resulting in 7218 (32.3%) imaging studies. After implementation of age-adjusted d-dimer, 25,082 were performed of which 10,851 (43.2%) were positive resulting in 7017 (28.0%) imaging studies. (pre: 48.6%, post: 43.2%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.067 |