Impact of Teledermatology Program on Dermatology Resident Experience and Education

Background: Despite many dermatology residency programs establishing teledermatology programs, few studies have analyzed its impact on resident education. Introduction: We evaluated the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine teledermatology program at the Zuckerberg San Francisco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Telemedicine journal and e-health 2021-09, Vol.27 (9), p.162-1067
Hauptverfasser: Zakaria, Adam, Maurer, Toby, Amerson, Erin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Despite many dermatology residency programs establishing teledermatology programs, few studies have analyzed its impact on resident education. Introduction: We evaluated the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine teledermatology program at the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (ZSFG). We sought to evaluate resident perspectives on teledermatology and quantify its effects on the number of cases evaluated. Materials and Methods: Each week, dermatology residents triage new teledermatology referrals under the supervision of a dermatology attending. We anonymously surveyed dermatology residents and recent graduates who participated in teledermatology and evaluated responses through inductive thematic analysis. We also used administrative records to compare the productivity ratio (cases evaluated per hour) in clinic versus in teledermatology from June to December 2017. Results: Fifteen out of 21 (71%) potential respondents completed the survey. Five primary content areas emerged through the analysis, with teledermatology providing high caseload, a low-stress learning environment, and opportunities to consider a broad differential diagnoses while developing visual diagnostic and triaging skills. Residents had a productivity ratio of 4.55 (680.7 patients/149.7 h) in dermatology clinic versus 11.49 (299.7 patients/26.1 h) in teledermatology sessions. Discussion: Our thematic analysis to identify the most valued components of teledermatology is novel and can aid the design of teledermatology programs in other settings. We also found that residents evaluated twice the number of patient cases per unit time, with the implication that teledermatology can catalyze the development of visual morphology abilities. Conclusions: Teledermatology is viewed positively by dermatology residents and enables efficient case review by residents.
ISSN:1530-5627
1556-3669
DOI:10.1089/tmj.2020.0350