Do safety-net hospitals provide equitable care after decompressive surgery for acute cauda equina syndrome?
•Safety-net hospitals had greater inpatient costs in performing emergent decompression for cauda equina syndrome.•Safety-net hospitals did not have greater LOS in performing emergent decompression.•Safety-net hospitals did not have greater rates of inpatient adverse events in performing emergent dec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2021-01, Vol.200, p.106356-106356, Article 106356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Safety-net hospitals had greater inpatient costs in performing emergent decompression for cauda equina syndrome.•Safety-net hospitals did not have greater LOS in performing emergent decompression.•Safety-net hospitals did not have greater rates of inpatient adverse events in performing emergent decompression.
Safety-net hospitals provide care to a substantial share of disadvantaged patient populations. Whether disparities exist between safety-net hospitals and their counterparts in performing emergent neurosurgical procedures has not yet been examined.
We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a national all-payer inpatient healthcare database, to determine whether safety-net hospitals provide equitable care after decompressive surgery for acute cauda equina syndrome (CES).
The NIS from 2002 to 2011 was queried for patients with a diagnosis of acute CES who received decompressive surgery. Hospital safety-net burden was designated as low (LBH), medium (MBH), or high (HBH) based on the proportion of inpatient admissions that were billed as Medicaid, self-pay, or charity care. Etiologies of CES were classified as degenerative, neoplastic, trauma, and infectious. Significance was defined at p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0303-8467 1872-6968 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106356 |