Maladaptive emotion regulation traits predict altered corticolimbic recovery from psychosocial stress

•Adaptive neural stress recovery and regulation are key to mental health.•Neural recovery after psychosocial stress was assessed in fMRI.•Emotion regulation scores were correlated with positive/negative recovery.•Positive evaluation increased corticolimbic adjustment in poor emotion regulators.•Alte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2021-02, Vol.280 (Pt A), p.54-63
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Ryan J., Apazoglou, Kalliopi, Celen, Zeynep, Dayer, Alexandre, Aubry, Jean-Michel, Ville, Dimitri Van De, Vuilleumier, Patrik, Piguet, Camille
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Adaptive neural stress recovery and regulation are key to mental health.•Neural recovery after psychosocial stress was assessed in fMRI.•Emotion regulation scores were correlated with positive/negative recovery.•Positive evaluation increased corticolimbic adjustment in poor emotion regulators.•Altered stress recovery and regulation may be risk factors for affective disorders. Adaptive recovery from stress promotes healthy cognitive affective functioning, whereas maladaptive recovery is linked to poor psychological outcomes. Neural regions, like the anterior cingulate and hippocampus, play critical roles in psychosocial stress responding and serve as hubs in the corticolimbic neural system. To date, however, it is unknown how cognitive emotion regulation traits (cER), adaptive and maladaptive, influence corticolimbic stress recovery. Here, we examined acute psychosocial stress neural recovery, accounting for cER. Functional neuroimaging data were collected while forty-seven healthy participants performed blocks of challenging, time-sensitive, mental calculations. Participants immediately received performance feedback (positive/negative/neutral) and their ranking, relative to fictitious peers. Participants rested for 90 seconds after each feedback, allowing for a neural stress recovery period. Collected before scanning, cER scores were correlated with neural activity during each recovery condition. Negative feedback recovery yielded increased activity within the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala, but this effect was ultimately explained by maladaptive cER (M-cER), like rumination. Isolating positive after-effects (i.e. positive > negative recovery) yielded a significant positive correlation between M-cER and the anterior cingulate, anterior insula, hippocampus, and striatum. We provide first evidence of M-cER to predict altered neural recovery from positive stress within corticolimbic regions. Positive feedback may be potentially threatening to individuals with poor stress regulation. Identifying positive stress-induced activation patterns in corticolimbic neural networks linked to M-cER creates the possibility to identify these neural responses as risk factors for social-emotional dysregulation subsequent to rewarding social information, often witnessed in affective disorders, like depression.
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.122