Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing primary and metastatic lesions in patients with liver cancer, as well as to compare it with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), liver MRI, and [ 18 F]-FDG PET/CT. Methods We performed a single-center pos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1604-1617 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing primary and metastatic lesions in patients with liver cancer, as well as to compare it with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), liver MRI, and [
18
F]-FDG PET/CT.
Methods
We performed a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis of data obtained from a prospective parent study (NCT04416165). This study included 34 patients diagnosed with or suspected hepatic lesions who underwent concomitant [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [
18
F]-FDG/CT scans. Moreover, these patients underwent liver MRI (
n
= 34) and CE-CT (
n
= 25). Histopathologic (
n
= 62) or radiographic follow-up (
n
= 128) served as the reference standard for the final diagnosis.
Results
Among the 34 patients, 20, 12, and 2 patients presented with hepatocellular carcinomas, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and benign hepatic nodules, respectively. The sensitivities of CE-CT, MRI, [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, and [
18
F]-FDG/CT for detecting primary liver tumors were 96%, 100%, 96%, and 65%, respectively. Regarding the diagnosis of all intrahepatic lesions, the per-lesion detection rate of [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was slightly lower than that of MRI (85% vs. 100%,
P
= 0.34) and significantly higher than that of [
18
F]-FDG PET/CT (85% vs. 52%,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0 |