Analysis of the effect of probucol-mecobalamin tablets combination on oxidative stress in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy

•DPN is a common and complex clinically chronic disease.•There are few reports on the efficacy of probucol combined with mecobalamin tablets on the treatment of patients with DPN.•The combined use of probucol and mecobalamin tablets could effectively reduce oxidative stress in patients with DPN. This research aimed to observe the effect of probucol combined with mecobalamin tablets on oxidative stress in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). In this prospective study, 104 patients with DPN who were treated in our hospital were included, from August 2018 to January 2020. They were divided into groups of combination (n = 52) and control (n = 52) by using a random number table. All patients took mecobalamin tablets after meals for 3 months (1 tablet/time, 3 times/d). On this basis, patients in the combination group took probucol for 3 months (4 tablets/time, 2 times/d). The observation indicators were the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)(symptom, sensory, and reflex scores), nerve conduction velocity[sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) and motor nerve conduction velocity(MNCV) of the common peroneal nerve and median nerve], oxidative stress indicators[superoxide dismutase(SOD), malondialdehyde(MDA), glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px) and catalase(CAT)], clinical efficacy and adverse reactions. There was no significant difference in the symptom scores, sensory scores, reflex scores, and total scores between the two groups before treatment (p > 0.05), while these four indicators of the combination group were significantly lower than that in the control group after treatment (p < 0.05). These four indicators of the two groups after treatment were significantly lower than before treatment (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the SNCV and NMCV of the common peroneal nerve and median nerve between the two groups before treatment (p > 0.05), while the indicators of the combination group were significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05) after treatment, and these indicators of the two groups after treatment were significantly higher than that before treatment (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in SOD, MDA, GSH-Px, and CAT between the two groups before treatment (p > 0.05). After treatment, the SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT in the combination group were significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05), while the MDA in the combination group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p