The utility of initial staging PET-CT as a baseline scan for surveillance imaging in stage II and III melanoma

This study evaluates the utility of whole-body PET-CT for the initial staging and subsequent surveillance imaging of patients with completely resected stage II and stage III melanoma. A single-center, retrospective review of patients who received perioperative whole-body PET-CT from January 1, 2005...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical oncology 2020-12, Vol.35, p.533-539
Hauptverfasser: Ravichandran, Surya, Nath, Neel, Jones, David C., Li, Gabriel, Suresh, Visakha, Brys, Adam K., Hanks, Brent A., Beasley, Georgia M., Salama, April K.S., Howard, Brandon A., Mosca, Paul J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study evaluates the utility of whole-body PET-CT for the initial staging and subsequent surveillance imaging of patients with completely resected stage II and stage III melanoma. A single-center, retrospective review of patients who received perioperative whole-body PET-CT from January 1, 2005 to December 1, 2019 within three months of initial melanoma diagnosis was performed. Of 258 total patients with completely resected melanoma who had a PET-CT within 3 months after their melanoma diagnosis, 113 had stage II and 145 had stage III melanoma. PET-CT detected distant metastasis in 3 (2.7%) of 113 stage II patients and 7 (4.8%) of 145 stage III patients. 179 of 258 patients had adequate follow-up time to determine whether they received surveillance cross-sectional imaging and whether they had a melanoma recurrence. 143 (79.9%) received subsequent surveillance imaging, 74 of whom developed a recurrence. In 64 (86.5%) of 74 cases, recurrence was detected by routine surveillance. 26 (34.2%) of 76 stage II and 65 (63.1%) of 103 stage III patients developed a recurrence. The median time to recurrence among the 179 patients for stage II and III was 16.3 and 13.0 months, respectively. These findings indicate that baseline staging with whole-body PET-CT rarely provides information that changes initial management. Rather, the value of the initial PET-CT is as a baseline for subsequent surveillance scans. Therefore, it may be premature to discourage cross-sectional imaging for patients with stage II and III melanoma without supportive evidence or a reliable biomarker of recurrent disease. •Baseline staging PET-CT in stage II and III melanoma patients rarely changed initial management.•The primary value of an initial PET-CT was that it served as a baseline for subsequent surveillance scans.•A large majority of patients who underwent initial staging with PET/CT were subsequently monitored with ongoing cross-sectional imaging surveillance.•The majority of melanoma recurrences were detected by cross-sectional surveillance imaging.
ISSN:0960-7404
1879-3320
DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2020.10.018