Perioperative pain control and tympanostomy tube outcomes
To evaluate perioperative pain management regimens as they relate to tympanostomy tube outcomes. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary referral children's hospital. and Methods: The medical records of patients ≤18 years old who underwent tympanostomy tube placement were reviewed for indications,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2020-11, Vol.138, p.110337-110337, Article 110337 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To evaluate perioperative pain management regimens as they relate to tympanostomy tube outcomes.
Retrospective chart review.
Tertiary referral children's hospital.
and Methods: The medical records of patients ≤18 years old who underwent tympanostomy tube placement were reviewed for indications, perioperative pain medications, post anesthesia recovery unit (PACU) measures, and tympanostomy tube occlusion rates.
Four hundred and fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 1.7 years (interquartile range: 1.2–3.3 years). Recurrent acute otitis media (n = 239, 52.5%) was the most common indication. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 (n = 244, 58.1%) or 2 (n = 176, 41.9%). Fentanyl alone (n = 321, 70.6%) was the most common intraoperative analgesic administered followed by ketorolac alone (n = 40, 8.8%), and fentanyl and ketorolac together (n = 58, 12.8%). There was no significant difference in FLACC pain score at discharge and recovery time (minutes) also did not differ by intraoperative analgesia group (34.3 ± 15.2 for fentanyl; 36.2 ± 13.0 for ketorolac; 31.0 ± 12.5 for fentanyl and ketorolac together). Forty nine patients (11.6%) had an occluded tympanostomy tube at follow-up. Patients ≤1 year of age had a significantly higher risk of tube occlusion than patients >1 year of age (23.7% vs. 8.9%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-5876 1872-8464 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110337 |