Photobiomodulation as adjunctive therapy for guided bone regeneration. A microCT study in osteoporotic rat model

Regeneration of diseased bone is challenging. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to favor the bone repair. Photobiomodulation (PBM) is also a recognized therapy able to improve bone repair in healthy and diseased individuals. Thus, with the hypothesis that PBM therapy could improve the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology Biology, 2020-12, Vol.213, p.112053-112053, Article 112053
Hauptverfasser: Alves, Fernando Amorim Mendonça, Marques, Márcia Martins, Cavalcanti, Samantha Christine Santos Xisto Braga, Pedroni, Ana Clara Fagundes, Ferraz, Emanuela Prado, Miniello, Thais Gimienez, Moreira, Maria Stella, Jerônimo, Tomaís, Deboni, Maria Cristina Zindel, Lascala, Cesar Angelo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Regeneration of diseased bone is challenging. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to favor the bone repair. Photobiomodulation (PBM) is also a recognized therapy able to improve bone repair in healthy and diseased individuals. Thus, with the hypothesis that PBM therapy could improve the GBR of diseased bone, this study evaluated the effect of PBM as adjunctive therapy to GBR in osteoporotic rats. Osteoporosis was induced in rats using the oophorectomy model. Then, 5-mm calvaria bone defects were created and treated according to the experimental groups, as follows: with no further treatment (Control); conventional GBR (Membrane), GBR and PBM applied with 3 s, 4 J/cm2 and 0.12 J per point (PBM-1) and GBR and PBM applied with 10s, 14 J/cm2, 0.4 J per point (PBM-2). PBM therapy (808 nm, 40 mW, 1.42 W/cm2) was applied immediately, 48 and 96 h postoperatively. Four and eight weeks later, the samples were harvested and processed for micro-computerized tomography (Micro CT). Data were statistically compared (p 
ISSN:1011-1344
1873-2682
DOI:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.112053