Early and sustained improvements in motor function in rats after infusion of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells following spinal cord injury

Study design Animal study. Objectives Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) have recently been shown to hold great therapeutic potential for spinal cord injury (SCI). However, majority of the studies have been done using human cells transplanted into the rat with immunosuppression;...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spinal cord 2021-03, Vol.59 (3), p.319-327
Hauptverfasser: Moinuddin, F. M., Yolcu, Yagiz U., Wahood, Waseem, Siddiqui, Ahad M., Chen, Bingkun K., Alvi, Mohammed Ali, Goyal, Anshit, Nesbitt, Jarred J., Windebank, Anthony J., Yeh, Jiunn-chern, Petrucci, Kathy, Bydon, Mohamad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study design Animal study. Objectives Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) have recently been shown to hold great therapeutic potential for spinal cord injury (SCI). However, majority of the studies have been done using human cells transplanted into the rat with immunosuppression; this may not represent the outcomes that occur in humans. Herein, we present the therapeutic effect of using rat UC-MSCs (rUC-MSC) without immunosuppression in a rat model of SCI. Setting Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Methods Twelve female rats were randomly divided into two groups, control, and rUC-MSC group, and then subjected to a T9 moderate contusion SCI. Next, 2 × 10 6 rUC-MSCs or ringer-lactate solution were injected through the tail vein at 7 days post injury. Rats were assessed for 14 weeks by an open-field Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) motor score as well as postmortem quantification of axonal sparing/regeneration, cavity volume, and glial scar. Results Animals treated with rUC-MSCs were found to have early and sustained motor improvement (BBB score of 14.6 ± 1.9 compared to 10.1 ± 1.7 in the control group) at 14 weeks post injury (mean difference: 4.55, 95% CI: 2.04 to 7.06; p value 
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
DOI:10.1038/s41393-020-00571-8