Incidence and characteristics of silent cerebral embolisms after radiofrequency‐based atrial fibrillation ablation: A propensity score‐matched analysis between different mapping catheters and indices for guiding ablation

Introduction The difference in the incidence and characteristics of silent cerebral events (SCEs) after radiofrequency‐based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation between the different mapping catheters and indices used for guiding radiofrequency ablation remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.16-26
Hauptverfasser: Nakamura, Kohki, Sasaki, Takehito, Take, Yutaka, Minami, Kentaro, Inoue, Mitsuho, Asahina, Chisa, Sasaki, Wataru, Kishi, Shohei, Yoshimura, Shingo, Okazaki, Yoshinori, Motoda, Hiroyuki, Niijima, Katsura, Miki, Yuko, Goto, Koji, Kaseno, Kenichi, Yamashita, Eiji, Koyama, Keiko, Funabashi, Nobusada, Naito, Shigeto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The difference in the incidence and characteristics of silent cerebral events (SCEs) after radiofrequency‐based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation between the different mapping catheters and indices used for guiding radiofrequency ablation remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence and characteristics of postablation SCEs between the following two groups: Group C, Ablation Index‐guided ablation using two circular mapping catheters with CARTO (Biosense Webster); Group R, local impedance‐guided ablation using one mini‐basket catheter and one circular mapping with Rhythmia (Boston Scientific). Methods and Results Of 211 consecutive patients who underwent an AF ablation and brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after the ablation, 120 patients (each group, n = 60) were selected by propensity score matching. SCEs were detected in 37 patients (30.8%). Group R had a higher incidence of SCEs (51.7% vs. 10.0%; p 
ISSN:1045-3873
1540-8167
DOI:10.1111/jce.14800