Motivation theory‐based physical activity programme for older adults in residential care facility: A modified Delphi and single‐group pretest‐posttest study
Background Physical inactivity exposes older adults living in long‐term care institutions to a high risk of health deterioration. Developing effective behaviour change interventions based on a theoretical framework is a pressing concern. Aims This study developed an ‘Easy Walking’ intervention progr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of older people nursing 2021-03, Vol.16 (2), p.e12355-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Physical inactivity exposes older adults living in long‐term care institutions to a high risk of health deterioration. Developing effective behaviour change interventions based on a theoretical framework is a pressing concern.
Aims
This study developed an ‘Easy Walking’ intervention programme based on the Wheel of Motivation and aimed to: (1) develop the intervention programme for promoting self‐efficacy of older adults living in long‐term care facilities; and (2) examine the perceived helpfulness of the intervention programme for encouraging walking behaviours.
Methods
This study consisted of two stages. In the first stage, a three‐round modified Delphi process was conducted with ten experts to rate the eight motivators in the Wheel of Motivation. The Easy Walking programme was designed accordingly. In the second stage, a single‐group pretest‐posttest study design was employed to evaluate the Easy Walking programme. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data on the changes in self‐efficacy and on the perceived helpfulness regarding the programme.
Results
The Easy Walking intervention programme features eight factors that influence motivation. Thirty older adults participated in and evaluated the programme. The results showed a significant difference in self‐efficacy (t = −7.02, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-3735 1748-3743 |
DOI: | 10.1111/opn.12355 |