Motivation theory‐based physical activity programme for older adults in residential care facility: A modified Delphi and single‐group pretest‐posttest study

Background Physical inactivity exposes older adults living in long‐term care institutions to a high risk of health deterioration. Developing effective behaviour change interventions based on a theoretical framework is a pressing concern. Aims This study developed an ‘Easy Walking’ intervention progr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of older people nursing 2021-03, Vol.16 (2), p.e12355-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Hui‐Ju, Chen, Kuei‐Min, Hsu, Hui‐Fen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Physical inactivity exposes older adults living in long‐term care institutions to a high risk of health deterioration. Developing effective behaviour change interventions based on a theoretical framework is a pressing concern. Aims This study developed an ‘Easy Walking’ intervention programme based on the Wheel of Motivation and aimed to: (1) develop the intervention programme for promoting self‐efficacy of older adults living in long‐term care facilities; and (2) examine the perceived helpfulness of the intervention programme for encouraging walking behaviours. Methods This study consisted of two stages. In the first stage, a three‐round modified Delphi process was conducted with ten experts to rate the eight motivators in the Wheel of Motivation. The Easy Walking programme was designed accordingly. In the second stage, a single‐group pretest‐posttest study design was employed to evaluate the Easy Walking programme. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data on the changes in self‐efficacy and on the perceived helpfulness regarding the programme. Results The Easy Walking intervention programme features eight factors that influence motivation. Thirty older adults participated in and evaluated the programme. The results showed a significant difference in self‐efficacy (t = −7.02, p 
ISSN:1748-3735
1748-3743
DOI:10.1111/opn.12355