Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances

The current study examined the stability of several antidoping prohibited substances analytes in urine after 15‐min exposure to UV‐C light in a Biosafety Level 2 cabinet. The urine matrices were exposed within the original antidoping bottles with the aim to destroy DNA/RNA and possible SARS CoV‐2. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug testing and analysis 2021-02, Vol.13 (2), p.460-465
Hauptverfasser: Voss, Sven, Abushreeda, Wadha, Vonaparti, Ariadni, Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha, Al‐Sowaidi, Noora, Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim, Mahieddine, Souhila, Khelifi, Safa, Salama, Sofia, Saleh, Amal, Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam, El‐Saftawy, Wesal, Al‐Hamad, Khalifa, Nofal, Ahmad, Dbes, Najib, Aguilera, Rodrigo, Al Maadheed, Mohammed, Georgakopoulos, Costas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 465
container_issue 2
container_start_page 460
container_title Drug testing and analysis
container_volume 13
creator Voss, Sven
Abushreeda, Wadha
Vonaparti, Ariadni
Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha
Al‐Sowaidi, Noora
Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim
Mahieddine, Souhila
Khelifi, Safa
Salama, Sofia
Saleh, Amal
Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam
El‐Saftawy, Wesal
Al‐Hamad, Khalifa
Nofal, Ahmad
Dbes, Najib
Aguilera, Rodrigo
Al Maadheed, Mohammed
Georgakopoulos, Costas
description The current study examined the stability of several antidoping prohibited substances analytes in urine after 15‐min exposure to UV‐C light in a Biosafety Level 2 cabinet. The urine matrices were exposed within the original antidoping bottles with the aim to destroy DNA/RNA and possible SARS CoV‐2. The analytes small molecules Phase I and Phase II metabolites and peptides, in total 444, endogenous, internal standards, and prohibited substances, pH, and specific gravity in urine were studied. The accredited analytical methods were used by Anti‐Doping Laboratory Qatar for the comparison of data of the same urine samples analyzed with and without UV‐C exposure. In the study conditions, no problems of stability were detected in the substances spiked in the urine samples exposed in the UV‐C irradiation. Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances studied in samples with and without irradiation. The UV‐C irradiation is degrading DNA/RNA and coronaviruses. The biosafety Level 2 cabinet use has been recommended by WADA.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dta.2954
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456419196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2456419196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-6929e556cebee0ba1b40eba7dadb1aab8741aec026a41e1970356ac5308dfda73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0Eon9A4gmQJS69pNiOk6yPZUsBaSUuLddobE-6rpw42E5hbzwCR56PJ8FLS5GQuNgjz-dvRvoR8oKzU86YeG0znArVyEfkkCspqq7l_PFDzeoDcpTSDWOtFHXzlBzUNeeqNA_JjzcuJBgw7-gGb9FTQQ1oN2GmV59-fvu-pt5dbzPFr3NIS0QaBprmEHOiMGVnw-yma7pdRpjoEss_mmCcPSZqQzmmkCkMA5pM87b0cnF7V4btNejLO1o6x7B12u3LtOjCTAbTM_JkAJ_w-f19TK4u3l6u31ebj-8-rM82lamlklWrhMKmaQ1qRKaBa8lQQ2fBag6gV53kgIaJFiRHrjpWNy2YpmYrO1jo6mNycuctW3xeMOV-dMmg9zBhWFIvZNNKrrhqC_rqH_QmLHEq2xVq1TWdkFL-FZoYUoo49HN0I8Rdz1m_T6svafX7tAr68l646BHtA_gnngJUd8AX53H3X1F_fnn2W_gLM3yhog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487572444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Voss, Sven ; Abushreeda, Wadha ; Vonaparti, Ariadni ; Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha ; Al‐Sowaidi, Noora ; Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim ; Mahieddine, Souhila ; Khelifi, Safa ; Salama, Sofia ; Saleh, Amal ; Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam ; El‐Saftawy, Wesal ; Al‐Hamad, Khalifa ; Nofal, Ahmad ; Dbes, Najib ; Aguilera, Rodrigo ; Al Maadheed, Mohammed ; Georgakopoulos, Costas</creator><creatorcontrib>Voss, Sven ; Abushreeda, Wadha ; Vonaparti, Ariadni ; Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha ; Al‐Sowaidi, Noora ; Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim ; Mahieddine, Souhila ; Khelifi, Safa ; Salama, Sofia ; Saleh, Amal ; Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam ; El‐Saftawy, Wesal ; Al‐Hamad, Khalifa ; Nofal, Ahmad ; Dbes, Najib ; Aguilera, Rodrigo ; Al Maadheed, Mohammed ; Georgakopoulos, Costas</creatorcontrib><description>The current study examined the stability of several antidoping prohibited substances analytes in urine after 15‐min exposure to UV‐C light in a Biosafety Level 2 cabinet. The urine matrices were exposed within the original antidoping bottles with the aim to destroy DNA/RNA and possible SARS CoV‐2. The analytes small molecules Phase I and Phase II metabolites and peptides, in total 444, endogenous, internal standards, and prohibited substances, pH, and specific gravity in urine were studied. The accredited analytical methods were used by Anti‐Doping Laboratory Qatar for the comparison of data of the same urine samples analyzed with and without UV‐C exposure. In the study conditions, no problems of stability were detected in the substances spiked in the urine samples exposed in the UV‐C irradiation. Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances studied in samples with and without irradiation. The UV‐C irradiation is degrading DNA/RNA and coronaviruses. The biosafety Level 2 cabinet use has been recommended by WADA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dta.2954</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33119942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anabolic Agents - urine ; antidoping analysis ; Biosafety Level 2 ; Containment of Biohazards - methods ; Doping in Sports ; Drug testing ; Drugs &amp; sports ; Humans ; stability ; Substance Abuse Detection - methods ; Ultraviolet Rays ; Urinalysis - methods ; Urine ; UV‐C light</subject><ispartof>Drug testing and analysis, 2021-02, Vol.13 (2), p.460-465</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-6929e556cebee0ba1b40eba7dadb1aab8741aec026a41e1970356ac5308dfda73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-6929e556cebee0ba1b40eba7dadb1aab8741aec026a41e1970356ac5308dfda73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5517-0128 ; 0000-0001-5744-1243</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdta.2954$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdta.2954$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33119942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voss, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abushreeda, Wadha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonaparti, Ariadni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Sowaidi, Noora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahieddine, Souhila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khelifi, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salama, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Amal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Saftawy, Wesal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Hamad, Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nofal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dbes, Najib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilera, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Maadheed, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgakopoulos, Costas</creatorcontrib><title>Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances</title><title>Drug testing and analysis</title><addtitle>Drug Test Anal</addtitle><description>The current study examined the stability of several antidoping prohibited substances analytes in urine after 15‐min exposure to UV‐C light in a Biosafety Level 2 cabinet. The urine matrices were exposed within the original antidoping bottles with the aim to destroy DNA/RNA and possible SARS CoV‐2. The analytes small molecules Phase I and Phase II metabolites and peptides, in total 444, endogenous, internal standards, and prohibited substances, pH, and specific gravity in urine were studied. The accredited analytical methods were used by Anti‐Doping Laboratory Qatar for the comparison of data of the same urine samples analyzed with and without UV‐C exposure. In the study conditions, no problems of stability were detected in the substances spiked in the urine samples exposed in the UV‐C irradiation. Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances studied in samples with and without irradiation. The UV‐C irradiation is degrading DNA/RNA and coronaviruses. The biosafety Level 2 cabinet use has been recommended by WADA.</description><subject>Anabolic Agents - urine</subject><subject>antidoping analysis</subject><subject>Biosafety Level 2</subject><subject>Containment of Biohazards - methods</subject><subject>Doping in Sports</subject><subject>Drug testing</subject><subject>Drugs &amp; sports</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>stability</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Detection - methods</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>Urinalysis - methods</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>UV‐C light</subject><issn>1942-7603</issn><issn>1942-7611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0Eon9A4gmQJS69pNiOk6yPZUsBaSUuLddobE-6rpw42E5hbzwCR56PJ8FLS5GQuNgjz-dvRvoR8oKzU86YeG0znArVyEfkkCspqq7l_PFDzeoDcpTSDWOtFHXzlBzUNeeqNA_JjzcuJBgw7-gGb9FTQQ1oN2GmV59-fvu-pt5dbzPFr3NIS0QaBprmEHOiMGVnw-yma7pdRpjoEss_mmCcPSZqQzmmkCkMA5pM87b0cnF7V4btNejLO1o6x7B12u3LtOjCTAbTM_JkAJ_w-f19TK4u3l6u31ebj-8-rM82lamlklWrhMKmaQ1qRKaBa8lQQ2fBag6gV53kgIaJFiRHrjpWNy2YpmYrO1jo6mNycuctW3xeMOV-dMmg9zBhWFIvZNNKrrhqC_rqH_QmLHEq2xVq1TWdkFL-FZoYUoo49HN0I8Rdz1m_T6svafX7tAr68l646BHtA_gnngJUd8AX53H3X1F_fnn2W_gLM3yhog</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Voss, Sven</creator><creator>Abushreeda, Wadha</creator><creator>Vonaparti, Ariadni</creator><creator>Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha</creator><creator>Al‐Sowaidi, Noora</creator><creator>Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Mahieddine, Souhila</creator><creator>Khelifi, Safa</creator><creator>Salama, Sofia</creator><creator>Saleh, Amal</creator><creator>Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam</creator><creator>El‐Saftawy, Wesal</creator><creator>Al‐Hamad, Khalifa</creator><creator>Nofal, Ahmad</creator><creator>Dbes, Najib</creator><creator>Aguilera, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Al Maadheed, Mohammed</creator><creator>Georgakopoulos, Costas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5517-0128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5744-1243</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances</title><author>Voss, Sven ; Abushreeda, Wadha ; Vonaparti, Ariadni ; Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha ; Al‐Sowaidi, Noora ; Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim ; Mahieddine, Souhila ; Khelifi, Safa ; Salama, Sofia ; Saleh, Amal ; Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam ; El‐Saftawy, Wesal ; Al‐Hamad, Khalifa ; Nofal, Ahmad ; Dbes, Najib ; Aguilera, Rodrigo ; Al Maadheed, Mohammed ; Georgakopoulos, Costas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-6929e556cebee0ba1b40eba7dadb1aab8741aec026a41e1970356ac5308dfda73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anabolic Agents - urine</topic><topic>antidoping analysis</topic><topic>Biosafety Level 2</topic><topic>Containment of Biohazards - methods</topic><topic>Doping in Sports</topic><topic>Drug testing</topic><topic>Drugs &amp; sports</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>stability</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Detection - methods</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>Urinalysis - methods</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>UV‐C light</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voss, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abushreeda, Wadha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonaparti, Ariadni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Sowaidi, Noora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahieddine, Souhila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khelifi, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salama, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Amal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Saftawy, Wesal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Hamad, Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nofal, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dbes, Najib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilera, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Maadheed, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgakopoulos, Costas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug testing and analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voss, Sven</au><au>Abushreeda, Wadha</au><au>Vonaparti, Ariadni</au><au>Al‐Wahaibi, Aisha</au><au>Al‐Sowaidi, Noora</au><au>Al‐Mohannadi, Ibrahim</au><au>Mahieddine, Souhila</au><au>Khelifi, Safa</au><au>Salama, Sofia</au><au>Saleh, Amal</au><au>Al‐Mohannadi, Maryam</au><au>El‐Saftawy, Wesal</au><au>Al‐Hamad, Khalifa</au><au>Nofal, Ahmad</au><au>Dbes, Najib</au><au>Aguilera, Rodrigo</au><au>Al Maadheed, Mohammed</au><au>Georgakopoulos, Costas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances</atitle><jtitle>Drug testing and analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Test Anal</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>460-465</pages><issn>1942-7603</issn><eissn>1942-7611</eissn><abstract>The current study examined the stability of several antidoping prohibited substances analytes in urine after 15‐min exposure to UV‐C light in a Biosafety Level 2 cabinet. The urine matrices were exposed within the original antidoping bottles with the aim to destroy DNA/RNA and possible SARS CoV‐2. The analytes small molecules Phase I and Phase II metabolites and peptides, in total 444, endogenous, internal standards, and prohibited substances, pH, and specific gravity in urine were studied. The accredited analytical methods were used by Anti‐Doping Laboratory Qatar for the comparison of data of the same urine samples analyzed with and without UV‐C exposure. In the study conditions, no problems of stability were detected in the substances spiked in the urine samples exposed in the UV‐C irradiation. Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances studied in samples with and without irradiation. The UV‐C irradiation is degrading DNA/RNA and coronaviruses. The biosafety Level 2 cabinet use has been recommended by WADA.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33119942</pmid><doi>10.1002/dta.2954</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5517-0128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5744-1243</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-7603
ispartof Drug testing and analysis, 2021-02, Vol.13 (2), p.460-465
issn 1942-7603
1942-7611
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456419196
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Anabolic Agents - urine
antidoping analysis
Biosafety Level 2
Containment of Biohazards - methods
Doping in Sports
Drug testing
Drugs & sports
Humans
stability
Substance Abuse Detection - methods
Ultraviolet Rays
Urinalysis - methods
Urine
UV‐C light
title Biosafety Level 2 cabinet UV‐C light exposure of sports antidoping human urine samples does not affect the stability of selected prohibited substances
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biosafety%20Level%202%20cabinet%20UV%E2%80%90C%20light%20exposure%20of%20sports%20antidoping%20human%20urine%20samples%20does%20not%20affect%20the%20stability%20of%20selected%20prohibited%20substances&rft.jtitle=Drug%20testing%20and%20analysis&rft.au=Voss,%20Sven&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=460-465&rft.issn=1942-7603&rft.eissn=1942-7611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dta.2954&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2456419196%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487572444&rft_id=info:pmid/33119942&rfr_iscdi=true