The Patient-Reported Outcome Measures In Skin Cancer Reconstruction (PROMISCR) study: Anglicisation and initial validation of the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module in a UK cohort
Facial skin cancer is common, and its treatment affects patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as demonstrated by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In this study, we anglicise and validate the novel FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module for the UK population. Anglicisation of the FACE-Q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2021-03, Vol.74 (3), p.615-624 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Facial skin cancer is common, and its treatment affects patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as demonstrated by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In this study, we anglicise and validate the novel FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module for the UK population.
Anglicisation of the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module followed international guidance for cross-cultural adaptation. Cognitive interviews were performed, producing a reconciled and harmonised version for validation. Patients undergoing facial skin cancer excision were prospectively recruited and asked to complete the anglicised FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module, along with the Skin Cancer Index (SCI) and European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions (ED-5D) questionnaire, pre-operatively and 6–8 weeks post-operatively. Data were analysed using classical test theory. Ethical approval was obtained (REC: 16/WM/0445).
One hundred and ten patients were recruited between August 2017 and July 2018. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.867–0.967). All subscales had a single-factor solution using principal component analysis. Construct validity, as measured between the FACE-Q subscales and SCI subscales, was good, with >75% of a priori predictions confirmed. Pearson's r for item–total correlation was >0.80 for several items, and significant ceiling effects are shown in 7 of the 10 subscales, suggesting some item redundancy.
The UK version of this well-designed PROM demonstrates good face and construct validity. There is however a degree of redundancy within the scales, and further work using Rasch analysis on a larger sample will help address this. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.09.005 |