Comparative study of arsenic removal by iron-based nanomaterials: Potential candidates for field applications

Graphene oxide supported magnetite (GM) and graphene oxide supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (GNZVI) nanohybrids were compared for arsenic removal at a wide pH range (3‐9). While already published work reported high process efficiency for GM and GNZVI, they cannot be compared one-on-one given the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-04, Vol.764, p.142914-142914, Article 142914
Hauptverfasser: Das, Tonoy K., Bezbaruah, Achintya N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Graphene oxide supported magnetite (GM) and graphene oxide supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (GNZVI) nanohybrids were compared for arsenic removal at a wide pH range (3‐9). While already published work reported high process efficiency for GM and GNZVI, they cannot be compared one-on-one given the non-identical experimental conditions. Each researcher team used different initial arsenic concentration, solution pH, and adsorbent dose. This study evaluated GM and GNZVI, bare magnetite (M), and bare nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) for aqueous arsenic removal under similar experimental conditions. GNZVI worked more efficiently (>90%) in a wide pH range (3–9) for both As(III) and As(V), while GM was efficient (>90%) only at pH 3 for As(V) and As(III) removal was maximum of ~80% at pH 9. GNZVI also exhibited better aqueous dispersibility with a zeta potential of −21.02 mV compared to other adsorbents in this experiment. The arsenic removal based on normalized iron content indicated that the nanohybrids recorded improved arsenic removal compare to bare nanoparticles, and GNZVI worked the best. In NZVI-based nanomaterials (GNZVI and NZVI), electrostatic attraction played a limited role while surface complexation was dominant in removal of both the arsenic species. In case of M-based nanomaterials (GM and M), As(V) removal was controlled by electrostatic attraction while As(III) adsorption was ligand exchange and surface complexation. GNZVI has the potential for field application for drinking water arsenic removal. [Display omitted] •Zero-valent Fe0 based nanomaterials removed arsenic better than the magnetite-based ones.•Arsenic removal by nanohybrids was higher than their bare iron counterparts (nanoscale Fe0 and magnetite)•Graphene oxide-nano Fe0 was the most efficient nanohybrid for As(III) and As(V) removal (pH 3–9)•Graphene oxide-nano Fe0 nanohybrid has potential for field applications for water treatment
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142914