Management and 1-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery

Purpose To analyze different types of management and one-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage (AL) after elective colorectal resection. Methods All patients with anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis (76/1,546; 4.9%), with the exclusion of cases with proximal diverti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of colorectal disease 2021-05, Vol.36 (5), p.929-939
Hauptverfasser: Borghi, Felice, Migliore, Marco, Cianflocca, Desirée, Ruffo, Giacomo, Patriti, Alberto, Delrio, Paolo, Scatizzi, Marco, Mancini, Stefano, Garulli, Gianluca, Lucchi, Andrea, Carrara, Alessandro, Pirozzi, Felice, Scabini, Stefano, Liverani, Andrea, Baiocchi, Gianluca, Campagnacci, Roberto, Muratore, Andrea, Longo, Graziano, Caricato, Marco, Macarone Palmieri, Raffaele, Vettoretto, Nereo, Ciano, Paolo, Benedetti, Michele, Bertocchi, Elisa, Ceccaroni, Marcello, Pace, Ugo, Pandolfini, Lorenzo, Sagnotta, Andrea, Pirrera, Basilio, Alagna, Vincenzo, Martorelli, Giacomo, Tirone, Giuseppe, Motter, Michele, Sciuto, Antonio, Martino, Antonio, Scarinci, Andrea, Molfino, Sarah, Maurizi, Angela, Marsanic, Patrizia, Tomassini, Federico, Santoni, Simone, Capolupo, Gabriella Teresa, Amodio, Pietro, Arici, Elisa, Cicconi, Simone, Marziali, Irene, Guercioni, Gianluca, Catarci, Marco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To analyze different types of management and one-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage (AL) after elective colorectal resection. Methods All patients with anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis (76/1,546; 4.9%), with the exclusion of cases with proximal diverting stoma, were followed-up for at least one year. Primary endpoints were as follows: composite outcome of one-year mortality and/or unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission and additional morbidity rates. Secondary endpoints were as follows: length of stay (LOS), one-year persistent stoma rate, and rate of return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT). Results One-year mortality rate was 10.5% and unplanned ICU admission rate was 30.3%. Risk factors of the composite outcome included age (aOR = 1.08 per 1-year increase, p = 0.002) and anastomotic breakdown with end stoma at reoperation (aOR = 2.77, p = 0.007). Additional morbidity rate was 52.6%: risk factors included open versus laparoscopic reoperation (aOR = 4.38, p = 0.03) and ICU admission (aOR = 3.63, p = 0.05). Median (IQR) overall LOS was 20 days (14–26), higher in the subgroup of patients reoperated without stoma. At 1 year, a stoma persisted in 32.0% of patients, higher in the open (41.2%) versus laparoscopic (12.5%) reoperation group ( p = 0.04). Only 4 out of 18 patients (22.2%) were able to RIOT. Conclusion Mortality and/or unplanned ICU admission rates after AL are influenced by increasing age and by anastomotic breakdown at reoperation; additional morbidity rates are influenced by unplanned ICU admission and by laparoscopic approach to reoperation, the latter also reducing permanent stoma and failure to RIOT rates. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03560180
ISSN:0179-1958
1432-1262
DOI:10.1007/s00384-020-03777-7