Evaluating High Spatial Resolution Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging at 3T: Reproducibility and Quality of Fit
Background Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) quantifies the non‐Gaussian diffusion of water within tissue microstructure. However, it has increased fitting parameters and requires higher b‐values. Evaluation of DKI reproducibility is important for clinical purposes. Purpose To assess the reproducibil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2021-04, Vol.53 (4), p.1175-1187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) quantifies the non‐Gaussian diffusion of water within tissue microstructure. However, it has increased fitting parameters and requires higher b‐values. Evaluation of DKI reproducibility is important for clinical purposes.
Purpose
To assess the reproducibility in whole‐brain high‐resolution DKI at varying b‐values.
Study Type
Retrospective.
Subjects and Phantoms
In all, 44 individuals from the test–retest Human Connectome Project (HCP) database and 12 3D‐printed phantoms.
Field Strength/Sequence
Diffusion‐weighted multiband echo‐planar imaging sequence at 3T and 9.4T. magnetization‐prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo at 3T for in vivo structural data only.
Assessment
From HCP data with b‐values = 1000, 2000, 3000 s/mm2 (dataset A), two additional datasets with b‐values = 1000, 3000 s/mm2 (dataset B) and b‐values = 1000, 2000 s/mm2 (dataset C) were extracted. Estimated DKI metrics from each dataset were used for evaluating reproducibility and fitting quality in white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) based on whole‐brain and regions of interest (ROIs).
Statistical Tests
DKI reproducibility was assessed using the within‐subject coefficient of variation (CoV), fitting residuals to evaluate DKI fitting accuracy and Pearson's correlation to investigate the presence of systematic biases. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for statistical comparison.
Results
Datasets A and B exhibited lower DKI CoVs ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.27408 |