Evaluating High Spatial Resolution Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging at 3T: Reproducibility and Quality of Fit

Background Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) quantifies the non‐Gaussian diffusion of water within tissue microstructure. However, it has increased fitting parameters and requires higher b‐values. Evaluation of DKI reproducibility is important for clinical purposes. Purpose To assess the reproducibil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2021-04, Vol.53 (4), p.1175-1187
Hauptverfasser: Kasa, Loxlan W., Haast, Roy A.M., Kuehn, Tristan K., Mushtaha, Farah N., Baron, Corey A., Peters, Terry, Khan, Ali R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) quantifies the non‐Gaussian diffusion of water within tissue microstructure. However, it has increased fitting parameters and requires higher b‐values. Evaluation of DKI reproducibility is important for clinical purposes. Purpose To assess the reproducibility in whole‐brain high‐resolution DKI at varying b‐values. Study Type Retrospective. Subjects and Phantoms In all, 44 individuals from the test–retest Human Connectome Project (HCP) database and 12 3D‐printed phantoms. Field Strength/Sequence Diffusion‐weighted multiband echo‐planar imaging sequence at 3T and 9.4T. magnetization‐prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo at 3T for in vivo structural data only. Assessment From HCP data with b‐values = 1000, 2000, 3000 s/mm2 (dataset A), two additional datasets with b‐values = 1000, 3000 s/mm2 (dataset B) and b‐values = 1000, 2000 s/mm2 (dataset C) were extracted. Estimated DKI metrics from each dataset were used for evaluating reproducibility and fitting quality in white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) based on whole‐brain and regions of interest (ROIs). Statistical Tests DKI reproducibility was assessed using the within‐subject coefficient of variation (CoV), fitting residuals to evaluate DKI fitting accuracy and Pearson's correlation to investigate the presence of systematic biases. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for statistical comparison. Results Datasets A and B exhibited lower DKI CoVs (
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.27408