Microscopic Colitis Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Low Bone Density

Background Microscopic colitis (MC) is a subtype of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with overlapping risk factors for low bone density (LBD). While LBD is a known complication of IBD, its association with MC is not well-established. Aims Assess the prevalence of LBD in MC compared to control popula...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive diseases and sciences 2021-10, Vol.66 (10), p.3542-3547
Hauptverfasser: Graziano, Elliot J., Vaughn, Byron P., Wang, Qi, Chow, Lisa S., Campbell, James P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Microscopic colitis (MC) is a subtype of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with overlapping risk factors for low bone density (LBD). While LBD is a known complication of IBD, its association with MC is not well-established. Aims Assess the prevalence of LBD in MC compared to control populations, and evaluate if MC predicts LBD when controlling for confounders. Methods Retrospective, observational case control study of adult patients with pathologically confirmed MC from 2005 to 2015. Bone density measurements were abstracted from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) reports, and bone density was classified using T -score: normal ( T  ≥ − 1.0), osteopenia (− 1.0 >  T  > -2.5) or osteoporosis ( T  ≤ − 2.5). Demographics, disease, medication history and LBD risk factors were obtained from chart review. Prevalence of LBD was compared to national and local controls. A matched control cohort to MC patients without prior diagnosis of LBD was analyzed with logistic regression to assess the relationship of MC to LBD. Results One hundred and eighteen patients with MC were identified. Osteopenia in women with MC was more prevalent compared to national controls (67% vs. 49%, p  = 0.0004), and LBD was more prevalent in MC patients compared to local controls (82% vs. 55%, p  
ISSN:0163-2116
1573-2568
DOI:10.1007/s10620-020-06651-2