Magnetic resonance-guided re-ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with a lower recurrence rate: a case–control study

Abstract Aims Our aim was to analyse whether using delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) to localize veno-atrial gaps in atrial fibrillation (AF) redo ablation procedures improves outcomes during follow-up. Methods and results We conducted a case–control study with 35 conse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Europace (London, England) England), 2020-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1805-1811
Hauptverfasser: Quinto, Levio, Cozzari, Jenniffer, Benito, Eva, Alarcón, Francisco, Bisbal, Felipe, Trotta, Omar, Caixal, Gala, San Antonio, Rodolfo, Garre, Paz, Prat-Gonzalez, Susana, Perea, Rosario Jesús, Tolosana, José Maria, Berruezo, Antonio, Arbelo, Elena, Roca-Luque, Ivo, Sitges, Marta, Brugada, Josep, Guasch, Eduard, Mont, Lluís
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims Our aim was to analyse whether using delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) to localize veno-atrial gaps in atrial fibrillation (AF) redo ablation procedures improves outcomes during follow-up. Methods and results We conducted a case–control study with 35 consecutive patients undergoing a DE-CMR-guided Repeat-pulmonary vein isolation (Re-PVI) procedure. Those with more extensive ablations (e.g. roof lines, box) were excluded. Patients were matched for age, sex, AF pattern, and left atrial dimension with 35 patients who had undergone a conventional Re-PVI procedure guided with a three dimensional (3D)-navigation system. Procedural characteristics were recorded, and patients were followed for 24 months in a specialized outpatient clinic. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent AF, atrial tachycardia, or flutter. The duration of CMR-guided procedures was shorter compared to the conventional group (161 ± 52 vs. 195 ± 72 min, respectively, P = 0.049), with no significant differences in fluoroscopy or total radiofrequency time. At the 2-year follow-up, more patients in the DE-CMR-guided group remained free from recurrences compared with the conventional group (70% vs. 39%, respectively, P = 0.007). In univariate Cox-regression analyses, AF pattern [persistent AF, hazard ratio (HR) 2.66 (1.27–5.46), P = 0.006] and the use of DE-CMR [HR 0.36 (0.17–0.79), P = 0.009] predicted recurrences during follow-up; both factors remained independent predictors in multivariate analyses. Conclusion The substrate characterization provided by DE-CMR facilitates the identification of anatomical veno-atrial gaps and associates with shorter procedures and better clinical outcomes in repeated AF ablation procedures.
ISSN:1099-5129
1532-2092
DOI:10.1093/europace/euaa252