Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Based Functional SYNTAX Score in Patients With Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
BACKGROUND:The potential impact of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) based functional Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (FSSQFR) on prognostication and revascularization strategy choice has not been fully investigated, and the discriminant a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2020-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e009155-e009155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND:The potential impact of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) based functional Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (FSSQFR) on prognostication and revascularization strategy choice has not been fully investigated, and the discriminant ability of FSSQFR needs further validation.
METHODS:QFR was retrospectively analyzed in left main or patients with multivessel coronary artery disease from the PANDA III trial. A total of 607 patients with analyzable QFR in all vessels were included. FSSQFR was counted by summing the individual scores only in ischemia-producing lesions (vessel QFR ≤0.8). Patients were stratified according to tertiles of SYNTAX score (SS), and 3 groups of FSS were divided by the same cutoff score. The primary end point was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization).
RESULTS:After calculating the FSSQFR, 16% (96/607) of study patients moved from higher-risk group by SS to lower-risk group. In the low, intermediate, and high FSSQFR group, the cumulative incidence of 2-year major adverse cardiac events was 9.1%, 13.5%, and 22.3% (P=0.0004), and the rate of a composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (3.8%, 7.3%, and 13.7%, P=0.0006) was also increased. Compared with SS, FSSQFR significantly improved risk classification and prognostication (area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristics 0.65 versus 0.62, P=0.0009). Moreover, 6% (38/607) of patients, for whom coronary artery bypass grafting would be recommended according to SS, converted to favor percutaneous coronary intervention after FSSQFR calculation. After multivariate adjustment, FSSQFR was an independent predictor of 2-year major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02–1.07]; P=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease, FSSQFR showed applicability in prognostication and revascularization strategy choice. An improved scoring system combining anatomy and physiology (FSSQFR) discriminated the risk of adverse events modestly better than anatomic assessment (SS) alone.
REGISTRATION:URLhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT02017275. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1941-7632 1941-7640 1941-7632 |
DOI: | 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009155 |